Stakeholder Management in Complex Project: Review of Contemporary Literature.

Nguyen, Tom; Mohamed, Sherif Ali Mohtady; Panuwatwanich, Kriengsak

doi:10.32738/jeppm.201807.0003

Cited by 48 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 106 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Urban planning is a complex process that faces the challenge of different risks and issues due to the project characteristics, where the interrelationships between stakeholders can lead to conflicts of interests, concerns and to a complex decision-making process [45,46].…”

Section: Stakeholder Analysis (Sa)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture

Lami

Mecca

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability is an inherent urban and architectural problem. It is simultaneously characterized by many different dimensions, pursuing heterogeneous and often conflicting objectives. To help address these complexities in a structured way, this paper illustrates an integrated assessment framework to tackle social sustainability, in order to support the decision-making process towards sustainable architecture. This integrated decision support framework was applied to a case study concerning a new cultural centre at the Politecnico di Torino in Italy. The aim of this paper is to propose a decision support methodological framework for the analysis, graphical visualization and evaluation of social sustainability of architectural projects. It combines three methods: first, Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis, to get a guided understanding of the project and detect the best design strategies; second, the Stakeholder Analysis (SA), to develop a strategic view of the actors involved; third, the Social Return of the Investment (SROI) as a methodological tool for social impact assessment. This framework, presented through the discussion of some project solutions, helps us to analyse the architectural material effect of social sustainability and answer the question: Are we investing properly and creating spaces sufficiently functional to build better conditions for our community and our city?

show abstract

Section: Stakeholder Analysis (Sa)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture

Lami

Mecca

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consequently, the subject became more complex, incorporating different definitions and contexts. Today, PSM explains a broad range of topics such as stakeholder analysis, stakeholder influence and stakeholder management strategies, as well as stakeholder engagement and project evaluation-that is, project success, risks, and performance (Littau et al 2010;Nguyen et al 2018). The literature is tightly linked to stakeholder theory, but also draws from knowledge in social and behavioral theories or marketing communication (Derakhshan et al 2019a;Eskerod and Jepsen 2013, p. 2;Tong and Thomson 2015, p. 155).…”

Section: Project Stakeholder Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Project Stakeholder Management as the Integration of Stakeholder Salience, Public Participation, and Nonmarket Strategies

Joos

Knyphausen‐Aufseß

Pidun

2020

Schmalenbach Bus Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the increasingly active role of civic actors, there is often no possibility for them to participate in project planning and decision-making. This discrepancy leads to costly conflicts and even failures. Unfortunately, the literature on project stakeholder management does not have sufficient theoretical substantiation to address this issue. To fill this knowledge gap, we integrate the concepts of stakeholder salience, public participation, and nonmarket strategy, and apply them to two urban infrastructure projects in Germany. This study contributes to the literature in two dimensions. First, it offers a dynamic and conceptual model for project stakeholder management, providing explanations for different conflict intensities. Second, it advances each individual area of research. Examples include the identification and clustering of so-called nonmarket assets, an examination of the influence of nonmarket strategies on managers' perceptions of stakeholder salience, and the study of public participation in a corporate-political context, rather than a purely political one.

show abstract

“…Stakeholder analysis is a systematic approach for gaining information about relevant individuals, groups, or organizations to better understand their motivations, intentions, influence, and opinions (Brugha, 2000). Stakeholder analysis has been used to inform environmental decisionmaking, for example, for natural resource management (Raum, 2018), energy infrastructure planning (Nguyen et al, 2018), or environmental policy-making (D'Agostino et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Robustness of LCA Results Through Stakeholder Engagement: A Case Study of Emerging Oil Sands Technologies

Sleep¹,

Dadashi²,

chen³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Life cycle assessments can help to inform decision-making about greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction opportunities but are often not embraced by stakeholders associated with industries where study results are highly scrutinized and often contentious. This project was motivated by stakeholder interest in understanding open source life cycle models (the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator, OPGEE, and the Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model, PRELIM) and how accurately they can estimate emissions for existing oil sands projects and emerging technologies. We evaluate the robustness of these models and improve them using data from three existing oil sands projects (mining + upgrading, mining + dilution, and steam assisted gravity drainage, SAGD, + dilution). The models are then applied to estimate the GHG emissions reduction potential for two emerging in situ oil sands technologies. We find that, when boundaries are aligned, OPGEE can generate upstream GHG emissions estimates for the projects modeled within 1-4% of company reported GHG emissions data. Extending the boundary to include indirect (life cycle) emissions can lead to a doubling in upstream GHG emissions intensity. The two emerging technologies evaluated in the study can reduce upstream emissions by 14-19% compared to a SAGD project operating at the same reservoir, or 1.4-1.9% on a well-to-wheel basis. This work contributes a revised process of conducting LCAs that includes stakeholder input throughout and results in more robust and transparent estimations of emissions from deploying existing and emerging technologies.<br>

show abstract

Stakeholder Management in Complex Project: Review of Contemporary Literature.

Cited by 48 publications

References 106 publications

Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture

Assessing Social Sustainability for Achieving Sustainable Architecture

Project Stakeholder Management as the Integration of Stakeholder Salience, Public Participation, and Nonmarket Strategies

Improving Robustness of LCA Results Through Stakeholder Engagement: A Case Study of Emerging Oil Sands Technologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About