2016
DOI: 10.1057/s41254-016-0002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder engagement in the city branding process

Abstract: This paper explores perceptions of stakeholder engagement in the city branding process from the perspective of two post-industrial cities: Sheffield, UK and Essen, Germany. This qualitative research utilises a multi case study approach, which allowed for semi-structure interviews and semiotics to be used. Preliminary findings highlight that there are four stakeholder 'levels'. Each of these stakeholder groupings is involved in the city branding process to some extend. Findings suggest that the degree of involv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most authors in the field are in agreement that place branding, of which city branding is a specific subset, is more complex in nature than product branding, because cities are truly multi-dimensional entities evoking a great variety of impressions and associations depending on people among whom and circumstances under which they are evoked [18]. One general message addressed at different groups of stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and expectations can lead to trouble, making it necessary to convey partially different (but not contradictory) messages to those various target groups [19][20][21]. City branding has more in common with the corporate branding that large companies and holdings with many different product lines engage in.…”
Section: City Branding: Theory and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors in the field are in agreement that place branding, of which city branding is a specific subset, is more complex in nature than product branding, because cities are truly multi-dimensional entities evoking a great variety of impressions and associations depending on people among whom and circumstances under which they are evoked [18]. One general message addressed at different groups of stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests and expectations can lead to trouble, making it necessary to convey partially different (but not contradictory) messages to those various target groups [19][20][21]. City branding has more in common with the corporate branding that large companies and holdings with many different product lines engage in.…”
Section: City Branding: Theory and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have highlighted the gap between desired identity and existing identity, as well as the importance to relate the former realistically to the latter, as key to successful city brand building (Anttiroiko, 2016;Vanolo, 2008a;Anholt 2007;Kavaratzis & Kalandides 2015;Merrilees and Herington, 2012;Henninger et al, 2016).…”
Section: Defining City Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is necessary to distinguish between desired and registered brands [28]. The idea of the latter includes not only what the city government wants or the perceptions of narrowly defined targets groups, but also inputs from various key stakeholders [29,30]. Brands are diffused when customers, outsiders and the media discuss these cases in an open environment, but they may also risk becoming more diffuse [31,32].…”
Section: City Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%