Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Enterprise: Evolving a Conceptual Framework, and a Case Study of ITC

Abstract

An intensive debate has been occurring among academics, consultants and corporate executives, resulting in many definitions of a more humane, more ethical and more transparent manner of conducting business. They have created, supported or criticized related concepts such as sustainable development, corporate citizenship, sustainable entrepreneurship, the triple bottom line, business ethics and corporate social responsibility (Van Marrewijk, ). In the midst of LPG (liberalization, privatization and globalization), with market expansion occurring and the customer base needing to be widened for long‐term profitability, can enterprise opt for sustainability through the stakeholder approach? Interestingly, the ITC (Imperial Tobacco Company) is a firm committed to the core values of sustainable development in agrobusiness and in other activities, which has made the corporation well known for its stand on sustainability. Hence, this study begins with a brief literature review on sustainable enterprise and an introduction to familiarize the reader with the case organization, to examine what has made the ITC remain a stalwart in sustainable development and to identify the factors that drive the ITC's vision of sustainability. Based on the identified factors, total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) has been used to evolve a framework of sustainable enterprises on the star model (Sushil, ), which explains the customer and the government as driving factors for sustainability along with the triple bottom line. To validate our study, data on surrogate measures of some of the variables have been taken from the annual reports of the ITC and the validation is performed using linear regression analysis. Finally, the future research scope and limitations of the study are discussed. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Circular business models for sustainable development: A “waste is food” restorative ecosystem

“…And the key role of the orchestrator is that of choosing and implementing the best mix of these crucial elements of network relationships and balancing the needs of the single actor with the needs of the whole ecosystem (Rantala, Ukko, Saunila, & Havukainen, ). The outcome of these dynamic and complex relationships is an “operational and economic architecture” supported by a “stakeholders' architecture” (ecosystem plus local communities and citizens; Anbarasan & Sushil, ). The model is sustainable from the social, environmental, and economic point of view (Adams, Jeanrenaud, Bessant, Denyer, & Overy, ; Belz & Binder, ).…”

Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance

“…Nonetheless, investment in CSR activities assists firms in developing and conveying firms' positive messages and reputations (Anbarasan & Sushil, ) through creating a distinctive brand recognition (Bai & Chang, ), attracting the public's opinion and ensuring the constructive participation of stakeholders in firms' activities (Boccia & Sarnacchiaro, ; Surroca et al, ) that drive the firms toward successful operation and competitiveness (Bai & Chang, ). CSR refers to the firms' strategic posture that tends to facilitate the social, economic, cultural, and environmental aspects of sustainability and growth (Ayuso & Navarrete‐Báez, ).…”

Community initiative investments as a strategy for development‐led business: Comparative analysis

“…Driven by private investment and widespread entrepreneurial activity, the economies of developing regions grow vigorously, creating jobs and wealth and bringing hundreds of millions of new consumers into the global marketplace every year (Prahalad & Hammond, ). Similarly, inclusive growth diminishes trade‐offs between growth and inequality because the poor become enfranchised as customers, employees, owners, suppliers, and community members (George, McGahan, & Prabhu, ; Anbarasan & Sushil, ).…”