2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production for better watershed management with the Freshwater Health Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, community engagement in designing post-buyout management practices through co-production addresses many of the observed buyout land use issues. The goal of co-production is to generate knowledge through collaboration and equal participation of researchers and stakeholders, sharing of skills and resources, and the development of pertinent and actionable solutions (Bezerra et al, 2023). While community engagement is frequently viewed as a one-way process of transmitting knowledge to the community or raising awareness in society, co-production involves collaboration from the stage of problem formation to the stage of implementation, resulting in more practical and meaningful solutions (Stilgoe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, community engagement in designing post-buyout management practices through co-production addresses many of the observed buyout land use issues. The goal of co-production is to generate knowledge through collaboration and equal participation of researchers and stakeholders, sharing of skills and resources, and the development of pertinent and actionable solutions (Bezerra et al, 2023). While community engagement is frequently viewed as a one-way process of transmitting knowledge to the community or raising awareness in society, co-production involves collaboration from the stage of problem formation to the stage of implementation, resulting in more practical and meaningful solutions (Stilgoe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%