Staff and patient experiences of decision-making about continuous observation in psychiatric hospitals

Abstract

PurposeContinuous observation of psychiatric inpatients aims to protect those who pose an acute risk of harm to self or others, but involves intrusive privacy restrictions. Initiating, conducting and ending continuous observation requires complex decision-making about keeping patients safe whilst protecting their privacy. There is little published guidance about how to balance privacy and safety concerns, and how staff and patients negotiate this in practice is unknown. To inform best practice, the present study, therefore, aimed to understand how staff and patients experience negotiating the balance between privacy and safety during decision-making about continuous observation.MethodsThematic analysis of qualitative interviews with thirty-one inpatient psychiatric staff and twenty-eight inpatients.ResultsMost patients struggled with the lack of privacy but valued feeling safe during continuous observation. Staff and patients linked good decision-making to using continuous observation for short periods and taking positive risks, understanding and collaborating with the patient, and working together as a supportive staff team. Poor decision-making was linked to insufficient consideration of observation’s iatrogenic potential, insufficient collaboration with patients, and the stressful impact on staff of conducting observations and managing risk.ConclusionsBest practice in decision-making about continuous observation may be facilitated by making decisions in collaboration with patients, and by staff supporting each-other in positive risk-taking. To achieve truly patient-centred decision-making, decisions about observation should not be influenced by staff’s own stress levels. To address the negative impact of staff stress on decision-making, it may be helpful to improve staff training, education and support structures.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1338-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Staff and patient perspectives on therapeutic engagement during one‐to‐one observation

“…Initial analysis generated themes in two largely mutually exclusive domains; the first relating to decision‐making processes behind negotiating privacy restrictions during one‐to‐one observation, and the second relating to the reciprocal experience of receiving and delivering therapeutic care during observation. We have previously published a separate analysis of themes relating to this first domain (Barnicot et al, ); the present paper represents a conceptually distinct analysis of themes relating to the second domain.…”

Strengthening mental health nurses' resilience through a workplace resilience programme: A qualitative inquiry

“…Other interpersonal stressors include being confronted with consumer‐related violence and aggression (Itzhaki et al., ; Zarea, Fereidooni‐Moghadam, Baraz, & Tahery, ), colleague‐related conflict (Ennis, Happell, Broadbent, & Reid‐Searl, ) and/or bullying (Cleary, Hunt, & Horsfall, ). In respect to their practice, mental health nurses (MHN hereafter) report that lack of role clarity (i.e., what is expected from them) (Hanna & Mona, ), insufficient numbers of staff with high‐quality practice skills and values (Jones & Gregory, ), and changing consumer risk profiles and associated containment and observational practices (Barnicot et al., ) can be challenging and stressful. From an organizational perspective, stressors include high acuity and high workloads (Yanchus, Periard, & Osatuke, ) in the context of inadequate staffing resources (McTiernan & McDonald, ), lack of effective clinical leadership (Ennis et al., ) and inadequate clinical supervision (White & Winstanley, ).…”

From the (Dis)comfort of One’s Own Home: Patients’ Experiences of Hospitalization After Discharge. A Qualitative Study of Lived Experience of Hospitalization from the Perspective of People with a Mental Health Disorder

“…Fleire studiar peikar på at personalet også kan kjenne seg utrygge, og frykt hos personalet kan hemme personalets evne til å skape gode relasjonar til pasientane (Barnicot et al, 2017;Blacker, Kurtz, & Goodwin, 2017;Gilburt, Rose, & Slade, 2008;Looi Rpn, Gabrielsson, Savenstedt, & Zingmark, 2014;. Dei av deltakarane i vår studie som reagerte på tryggleikstiltaka, følte at dersom dei tok til motmaele mot personalet, blei tiltaka berre strengare og strengare .…”