Our findings generate hypotheses on how participatory research into mental health issues can be fruitfully organized, in a way that empowers service users to active and constructive participation.

Aim A startling number of adolescents have mental health problems, yet research on the effect of routine care shows sobering effect sizes and high dropout rates. This study's objective was to gain in‐depth, first‐person knowledge about what adolescents need from their therapists to engage therapeutically and benefit from treatment. Method A total of 22 adolescents aged 14–19 years participated in qualitative focus groups or individual interviews of their own choosing. The data material was analysed using a systematic, step‐wise and consensual qualitative research framework for team‐based analysis. Findings Six themes emerged from the analysis, named from the words of the adolescent participants: (1) facing a scary situation: Attend to the adolescent's starting point, (2) be warm, invested and emotionally engaged, (3) offer live company and presence as a real human being, (4) have integrity as an adult and a professional, (5) know the world of a teenager and get into their stories and (6) have mutuality as a virtue and treat the adolescent as an equal. Discussion and implications Overall, adolescents regard the quality of the therapeutic relationship with their therapist as essential for the success of psychotherapy. In terms of their needs in treatment, therapists need to overcome the adolescents’ initial misgivings and scepticism towards therapy through establishing trust and accommodating their developmental desire for autonomy and connectedness.

In what should increase our confidence toward core aspects of ROM, we suggest that an integration of relational feedback concepts and stringent clinical dimension tracking into the ROM/CFS can be beneficial.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Studies investigating the subjective experiences of long-term recovery from substance use disorder are scarce. Particularly, functional and social factors have received little attention. Objectives: To investigate what long-term recovered service users found to build recovery from substance use disorder. Material and Methods: The study was designed as a phenomenological investigation subjected to thematic analysis. We interviewed 30 long-term recovered adult service users. Results: Our thematic analysis resulted in five themes and several subthemes: 1) paranoia, ambivalence and drug cravings: extreme barriers to ending use; 2) submitting to treatment: a struggle to balance rigid treatment structures with a need for autonomy; 3) surrendering to trust and love: building a whole person; 4) a life more ordinary: surrendering to mainstream social responsibilities; and 5) taking on personal responsibility and gaining autonomy: it has to be me, it cannot be you. Conclusions: Our study sample described long-term recovery as a developmental process from dependency and reactivity to personal autonomy and self-agency. The flux of surrendering to and differentiating from authority appeared to be a driving force in recovery progression. Participants called for treatment to focus on early social readjustment.

No abstract