2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03173-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable two-sided satisfied matching for ridesharing system based on preference orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For better matching results, the matching optimization strategies with fairness increase gradually, such as issue of matching on uncertain preference sequence [ 32 ], supply meet demand of technological knowledge [ 33 ], task match resource in cloud manufacturing [ 34 ], selection of foreign customers in B2B export cross-border e-commerce [ 35 ]. They achieve the fairness of matching mainly by setting weight coefficients for the preferences of both parties, such as (0.5, 0.5) [ 36 , 37 ], or the minimization of the absolute value of preference difference [ 32 , 34 ]. The difference of two numbers and the setting of two peers’ preferences weight cannot reflect the similarity and difference of peer’s subjective tendency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For better matching results, the matching optimization strategies with fairness increase gradually, such as issue of matching on uncertain preference sequence [ 32 ], supply meet demand of technological knowledge [ 33 ], task match resource in cloud manufacturing [ 34 ], selection of foreign customers in B2B export cross-border e-commerce [ 35 ]. They achieve the fairness of matching mainly by setting weight coefficients for the preferences of both parties, such as (0.5, 0.5) [ 36 , 37 ], or the minimization of the absolute value of preference difference [ 32 , 34 ]. The difference of two numbers and the setting of two peers’ preferences weight cannot reflect the similarity and difference of peer’s subjective tendency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preferences information is the key basis for matching decisions and often used in the research and practice of matching decision-making, such as cross-border e-commerce [ 35 ], ridesharing system [ 37 ], cloud manufacturing [ 34 , 46 ], and smart intelligent technique transfer [ 47 ]. Integrating the extant studies on preferences and satisfaction in e-trading and two-sided matching [ 34 , 37 , 48 , 49 ], we advanced the definition of preferences of P2P platform peers as follows.…”
Section: Fair Matching and The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, the disappointment theory suggests that when actual results are better than expected, policymakers will be ecstatic, when actual results are worse than expected, manufacturers will be disappointed, and that the greater the disparity between the outcome and the expectation, the greater the disappointment [21]. So far, there are three main contemporary disappointment models [25,26]. e first is the Bell-Loomes and Sugden disappointment model.…”
Section: Disappointmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al proposed a two-sided matching model to elaborate the preference order of SAD by considering the participants' psychological perception. Using the functions of disappointment and cheerfulness, this model effectively improves the carpool matching problem [26]. Another example is that by Fan et al, who proposed a two-way matching method that considers the psychological behavior of the agents of both parties and constructed a two-objective optimization model to obtain satisfactory matching results [29].…”
Section: Disappointmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation