2006
DOI: 10.1021/la061480w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Superhydrophobic Polybenzoxazine Surfaces over a Wide pH Range

Abstract: In this study, we report on a simple two-step casting process designed to create a stable superhydrophobic surface. This method possesses the advantages of being both simple and inexpensive as well as utilizing non-fluorine-containing compounds. Most interestingly, we found that the as-prepared surface possesses superhydrophobic properties not only for pure water but also for corrosive water under both acidic and basic conditions. Furthermore, the superhydrophobic polybenzoxazine surfaces had excellent environ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al 45 fabricated a superhydrophobic copper fatty acid carboxylate surface, and they reported that the surface had stability in observance to organic solvent treatment and exposure to air. Wang et al 17 studied the stability of the superhydrophobic polybenzoxazine surface for all the pH environments. Guo et al 46 tested the durability of SHS after a long time immersion in acid and alkali environments.…”
Section: Durability Of Shsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al 45 fabricated a superhydrophobic copper fatty acid carboxylate surface, and they reported that the surface had stability in observance to organic solvent treatment and exposure to air. Wang et al 17 studied the stability of the superhydrophobic polybenzoxazine surface for all the pH environments. Guo et al 46 tested the durability of SHS after a long time immersion in acid and alkali environments.…”
Section: Durability Of Shsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the success of a SHS depends not only on its wetting performances but also on its ability to last over time and resist to erosion and abrasion. 14,15 Nonetheless, only few papers so far have addressed the durability issues, each of them using a different method to assess surface durability, [16][17][18] so that a Assessing durability of superhydrophobic surfaces Malavasi, Bernagozzi, Antonini and Marengo systematic approach to the issue of durability is still lacking in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After dip-coating with M2 solution, the surface showed a dramatically reduced sliding angle of $60°at 0.05% of ATPS concentration, and then it further jumped to 10°at 0.1%. After then, the concentration increase only slightly reduce this value to 7°at 0.2%, but this value was inversely increased to 16°at 0.3%, This phenomenon is believed to be related to partially lost of the nano-size surface roughness due to over coating of the polymer [42]. Though this change was not clearly verified by SEM study for the sample dip-coating with 0.05-0.3% M2 solution.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Concentration Of M2 Solution On The Superhmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although great successes have been made in the preparation of such structures, and superhydrophobic surfaces with an apparent contact angle close to 180°have been prepared from many different techniques [13,31], the successful applications of these manmade superhydrophobic surface are still at the premature stage, mainly due to the lack of facile ways for large scale fabrication and insufficient durability of the prepared superhydrophobic structures [32][33][34][35][36][37]. For example, many superhydrophobic surface are directly built up on metal surfaces [16][17][18][19][20][21], which are not stable in the conditions for many of above mentioned applications because these condition are usually corrosive to metal and can easily destroy the superhydrophobic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach was to create a rough structure on a hydrophobic surface, [1,2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and the second approach was to decrease the surface energy of a rough surface by chemically bonding low surface-energy species to the surface. [9,[20][21][22][23][25][26][27] Several variations of these approaches exist which involve the formation of superhydrophobic surfaces by deposition of micelles of block copolymers, [28] containing polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) blocks, [29,30] as well as by the use of the LBL deposition of a mixture of polyelectrolyte-particles with further treatment with organosilanes. [30][31][32][33] The surface morphology was generated either by deposition of nanoparticles [29,30,34,35] to enhance the roughness of the coatings or by the treatment with selective solvents which provide, at the same time, surface migration of low surface energy blocks of the block copolymers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%