2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable splitting scheme for general form of associated plasticity including different scales of space and time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note in passing that the same kind of results can be used for other coupled problems where the time integration schemes of the sub-problems are different, such as thermomechanics [43] or with different time scales for mechanics and thermal component as well as a generalized nonlinear operator split for problems with internal variables [44]. However, the proof given herein is entirely original, as the dual quantities are exchanged in each iteration.…”
Section: Error Propagation Stability and Convergence Of Dfmt-bgs Algmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note in passing that the same kind of results can be used for other coupled problems where the time integration schemes of the sub-problems are different, such as thermomechanics [43] or with different time scales for mechanics and thermal component as well as a generalized nonlinear operator split for problems with internal variables [44]. However, the proof given herein is entirely original, as the dual quantities are exchanged in each iteration.…”
Section: Error Propagation Stability and Convergence Of Dfmt-bgs Algmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…v · e x = 1 − cos 2π t T char (44) where T char = 5 s. For such harmonic function, the solution of the fluid flow within the fluid-structure interaction problem exhibits an oscillating behavior that is reached after a short transition period. The maximum value of the Reynolds number in the cavity reaches Re = 200, and thus the flow can be considered as laminar.…”
Section: Lid-driven Cavity Flow With Flexible Bottommentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First option condenses the complete set of nonlinear algebraic equations into a single nonlinear scalar equation for each yield surface, which can be done if the matrix that relates the stress resultants and the strains has constant entries, see e.g. [47], [28]. Second option solves the complete set of nonlinear algebraic equations related to the update of internal variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second option solves the complete set of nonlinear algebraic equations related to the update of internal variables. We mention that the second option was elaborated in [28] for a general form of associated plasticity. The two derived procedures differ from one another by how the active set of yield surfaces is chosen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for computing these problems were developed using an explicit step-by-step integration scheme, which is numerically unstable and requires very small steps. In [10], a systematic approach to the numerical computation of plastic flow processes and construction of a numerical scheme of the Newton iteration process was developed. In [2,13], the implicit numerically stable scheme of intermediate points is used for the solution of problems of force elastoplastic deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%