2010
DOI: 10.1116/1.3488988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of a tungsten ⟨310⟩ cold field emitter

Abstract: Cold-field-emission current from a tungsten ⟨310⟩ emitter in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) gun, evacuated by an ion pump and a supplementary nonevaporative getter pump, was stabilized. It was verified that the probe current from a local (310) crystal plane exhibits different time variations in comparison to that of total current. As for the probe current under a pressure of 2×10−9 Pa, a stable plateau region—which lasted about 4 h—appeared just after flashing of the emitter. By observing emission patter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 90% decrease time was prolonged to 900 min from 290 min in the previous study. 10 This longer decrease time indicates that the pressure around the emitter was lower than that in the previous study in spite of the existence of the preaccelerator magnetic lens. The variation in the probe current was calculated as (I max À I min )/I mean , where I max , I min , and I mean are the maximum, minimum, and average current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 90% decrease time was prolonged to 900 min from 290 min in the previous study. 10 This longer decrease time indicates that the pressure around the emitter was lower than that in the previous study in spite of the existence of the preaccelerator magnetic lens. The variation in the probe current was calculated as (I max À I min )/I mean , where I max , I min , and I mean are the maximum, minimum, and average current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The behavior of the current variations was similar to that found in the previous study. 10 However, the time span of current decrease took one day because of the pressure reduction to 3 Â 10 À10 Pa. The probe current stayed almost constant for more than 10 h during the initial period of the measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3b). 33 It should also be noted that the W(310) emission was operated at an EHV of 10 À9 Pa while the LaB 6 nanoneedle was operated at an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) of 10 À7 Pa. We expect the LaB 6 nanoneedle to show even more stable emissions when it is operated in an EHV of 10 À9 Pa. The recovery and reproducibility of stable emission current aer exposure to air are also essential for practical applications and this has been veried by experimental measurements using a controlled procedure.…”
Section: Current Decay and Current Noise Of Lab 6 Nanoneedle Emittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their performance strongly depends on the quality of their electron sources [1]. Currently, the Schottky emitter [2,3] and Cold-field emitter [4][5][6] have been used as point electron sources with high brightness, high stability, and low energy spread. The zirconiacoated-tungsten (Zr/O/W) Schottky emitter, developed by Swanson et al [7,8], provides us with a particularly good balance of brightness (about 5× 10 7 A/cm 2 /sr at 5 kV), lifetime (in excess of 15,000 hours), and energy spread (about 0.4 eV) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%