2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of the domain interface contributes towards the catalytic function at the H-site of class alpha glutathione transferase A1-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-terminal helix region of GSTA1-1 is likewise known to behave in an independent manner compared with the remainder of the protein, and it is likely that the low temperature transition in the DSC thermogram of GSTA1-1 corresponds to changes in this element. However, previous studies have shown that the C terminus retains helical structure in this temperature regime (42,44). These results, in addition to the reversibility of the DSC scan up to 50°C, suggest that the lower temperature transitions are not due to unfolding per se, but may be due to temperaturedependent sampling of different locations by the C-terminal helix, or restructuring of its tertiary contacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The C-terminal helix region of GSTA1-1 is likewise known to behave in an independent manner compared with the remainder of the protein, and it is likely that the low temperature transition in the DSC thermogram of GSTA1-1 corresponds to changes in this element. However, previous studies have shown that the C terminus retains helical structure in this temperature regime (42,44). These results, in addition to the reversibility of the DSC scan up to 50°C, suggest that the lower temperature transitions are not due to unfolding per se, but may be due to temperaturedependent sampling of different locations by the C-terminal helix, or restructuring of its tertiary contacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…GSTA1-1 is a promiscuous enzyme, whereas GSTA4-4 has much higher substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency toward alkenal substrates, such as HNE, although it also maintains negligible stereoselectivity toward the individual enantiomers. The role of numerous interactions involving regions, such as the C-terminus or the domain-domain interface, have been explored with respect to enzyme stability and dynamics as well as the relationship to catalytic function (Adman et al, 2001; Balchin et al, 2010; Dirr et al, 2005; Dirr and Wallace, 1999; Gustafsson et al, 1999; Ibarra et al, 2001; Kuhnert et al, 2005; Mosebi et al, 2003; Nieslanik and Atkins, 2000; Nieslanik et al, 1999, 2001; Nilsson et al, 2002). Both isoforms utilize three substrate recognition regions (the β1-α1 region, the end of the α4-helix, and the C-terminus) to construct the H-sites in the folded protein.…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently proposed that the level of functional promiscuity of the GST enzymes is mediated by conformational flexibility and stability of the protein structure outside the active center (Balchin et al, 2010). This comes in agreement with the fact that GST subunits undergo significant conformational changes at substrate binding suggesting the induced fit mechanism (Neuefeind, Huber, Dasenbrock, Prade, & Bieseler, 1997;Sheehan et al, 2001).…”
Section: Usage Examplementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The SSPs Leu19, Tyr22, and Thr23 in α1 of the domain 1 and Phe157 in α6 of the domain 2 form interdomain contacts within one subunit by interacting with a hydrophobic pocket between α1 and α3 of the domain 1, and α6-8 of the domain 2. These specific contacts at the domain-domain interface can mediate the catalytic function by providing shape and flexibility to the active site for complementary interactions with the substrate (Balchin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Usage Examplementioning
confidence: 99%