2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.304386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Perspective for Catalytic Promiscuity

Abstract: Background: Catalytic promiscuity is common, but its molecular basis is poorly understood. Results: Differential scanning calorimetry reveals the local active site conformational landscape of a promiscuous detoxification enzyme, glutathione transferase A1-1, as "smooth" and heterogeneous. Conclusion: Facile conformational exchange facilitates substrate promiscuity. Significance: The results provide the first thermodynamic basis for catalytic promiscuity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional dimer found in GSTs was generated by the symmetry operator -x, y, -z+½ of the C 222 1 space group (Figure 3B). The interface involves 49 residues from each monomer and the buried surface area is ∼1645 Å 2 from each monomer (about 15% of the total solvent accessible area of each monomer), which is within the values found in most other GST families [1], [7], [9], [10]. The main regions involved in subunit interactions are residues 65–72 (part of helix H3), 80–85 (strand β4), 86–96 (helix H4), 105–128 (part of helix H5), 139–143 and 154–162 from helix H6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The functional dimer found in GSTs was generated by the symmetry operator -x, y, -z+½ of the C 222 1 space group (Figure 3B). The interface involves 49 residues from each monomer and the buried surface area is ∼1645 Å 2 from each monomer (about 15% of the total solvent accessible area of each monomer), which is within the values found in most other GST families [1], [7], [9], [10]. The main regions involved in subunit interactions are residues 65–72 (part of helix H3), 80–85 (strand β4), 86–96 (helix H4), 105–128 (part of helix H5), 139–143 and 154–162 from helix H6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…GSTs are known as promiscuous enzymes capable of catalyzing the conjugation of GSH with a broad range of electrophilic substrates [5]–[7]. Several members of the GST family are selectively induced by biotic and abiotic stress treatments and play important roles in the regulation of redox homeostasis as well as in endogenous metabolism [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis is difficult to address without tools to quantify promiscuity and ‘flexibility’. Honaker et al [65,66] used a series of mutants of the highly promiscuous GST enzymes to determine their substrate promiscuity against a highly diverse basis set of substrates. Fortuitously, some A-class GSTs exhibited a reversible low temperature, barrierless transition in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments that corresponds to rearrangement of the active site and its C-terminal ‘lid.’ From a specialized analysis of the DSC transition it was possible to estimate the conformational breadth or diversity of the active sites for the series of GSTs with a thermodynamic treatment.…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Promiscuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the antiviral protein RhTC, which was found to target different HIV viruses by allowing a dynamic active site to assume very different conformations [16]. More generally, emerging evidence is lending support to the view that functional promiscuity in enzymes may frequently be based on thermodynamic fluctuations of conformational sub-states [17]. However, this may not always be the case, for example, if the functional promiscuity is mediated by changes of catalytic residues that do not cause conformational changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%