Abstract:Instability of self-esteem and affect is present in bipolar patients, even when their symptoms are in remission, and has previously been found in people at genetic risk of the disorder. It may be a marker of vulnerability to the disorder.
“…However, because of prior work showing instability and even daily fluctuations in self-esteem in bipolar disorder (e.g. Knowles et al 2007) we had expected here as well a differential pattern for patients in reaction to the social comparison condition. The latter negative result can probably be explained by the nature of the measure which asks for general self-esteem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Based on the manic defence hypothesis and related research (Knowles et al 2007;Lyon et al 1999), we predicted that contrary to UD patients with euthymic BD will not report a change in explicit selfesteem after the upward social comparison but-similar to UD-show a decrease in implicit self-esteem. However, this specific hypothesis was not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buhrmester et al 2011;Leary and MacDonald 2003). Especially with respect to BD, instability of self-esteem has been described which was not restricted to being in clinically relevant mood episodes (Bentall et al 2011;Knowles et al 2007).…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) show stronger fluctuations in their self-esteem even during remission compared to healthy controls (Knowles et al 2007). There is accumulating evidence that vulnerability to BD is related to an increased sensitivity to cues of potential reward and reinforcement which is hypothesized to be linked to a dysregulation in the behavioural approach system (BAS; see therefore Alloy and Abramson 2010;Alloy et al 2009Alloy et al , 2012Johnson 2005).…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, remitted patients with BD often only show depression-like cognitions when compared to controls in the implicit assessment of self-esteem (e.g. in the Pragmatic Inference Task), but not in the explicit ones (Knowles et al 2007;Pardoen et al 1993). This discrepancy in results where the cognitive vulnerability of patients with BD looks similar to depressed patients when implicit measures are used but resembles healthy controls in explicit measures, has been discussed in the context of the reformulation of the manic defence hypothesis.…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
The current study tested whether experimentally induced social comparisons affect mood and self-esteem in euthymic unipolar and bipolar patients, compared to participants without any history of affective disorders. It was predicted that unfavourable upward comparisons with feedback that another person was performing better would have a negative effect on implicit self-esteem and explicit mood (positive and negative affect) in unipolar patients. We further predicted that favourable downward social comparisons with feedback that another person was performing worse will enhance mood and self-esteem, especially in bipolar patients. Participants were randomly assigned to upward or downward social comparison in a brainstorming task. As was expected, after upward comparison, negative affect increased, whereas positive affect decreased in all groups. After downward comparison, positive affect initially increased in unipolar and healthy subjects, while in bipolar patients no significant change in positive affect was observed. Implicit self-esteem generally showed an unexpected decrease regardless of the comparison condition and group. Remitted bipolar patients seemed to be less sensitive to positive feedback which may reflect 'dampening' of positive affect which has been observed before in bipolar patients.
“…However, because of prior work showing instability and even daily fluctuations in self-esteem in bipolar disorder (e.g. Knowles et al 2007) we had expected here as well a differential pattern for patients in reaction to the social comparison condition. The latter negative result can probably be explained by the nature of the measure which asks for general self-esteem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Based on the manic defence hypothesis and related research (Knowles et al 2007;Lyon et al 1999), we predicted that contrary to UD patients with euthymic BD will not report a change in explicit selfesteem after the upward social comparison but-similar to UD-show a decrease in implicit self-esteem. However, this specific hypothesis was not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buhrmester et al 2011;Leary and MacDonald 2003). Especially with respect to BD, instability of self-esteem has been described which was not restricted to being in clinically relevant mood episodes (Bentall et al 2011;Knowles et al 2007).…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) show stronger fluctuations in their self-esteem even during remission compared to healthy controls (Knowles et al 2007). There is accumulating evidence that vulnerability to BD is related to an increased sensitivity to cues of potential reward and reinforcement which is hypothesized to be linked to a dysregulation in the behavioural approach system (BAS; see therefore Alloy and Abramson 2010;Alloy et al 2009Alloy et al , 2012Johnson 2005).…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, remitted patients with BD often only show depression-like cognitions when compared to controls in the implicit assessment of self-esteem (e.g. in the Pragmatic Inference Task), but not in the explicit ones (Knowles et al 2007;Pardoen et al 1993). This discrepancy in results where the cognitive vulnerability of patients with BD looks similar to depressed patients when implicit measures are used but resembles healthy controls in explicit measures, has been discussed in the context of the reformulation of the manic defence hypothesis.…”
Section: Bipolar Disorder and Social Comparisonsmentioning
The current study tested whether experimentally induced social comparisons affect mood and self-esteem in euthymic unipolar and bipolar patients, compared to participants without any history of affective disorders. It was predicted that unfavourable upward comparisons with feedback that another person was performing better would have a negative effect on implicit self-esteem and explicit mood (positive and negative affect) in unipolar patients. We further predicted that favourable downward social comparisons with feedback that another person was performing worse will enhance mood and self-esteem, especially in bipolar patients. Participants were randomly assigned to upward or downward social comparison in a brainstorming task. As was expected, after upward comparison, negative affect increased, whereas positive affect decreased in all groups. After downward comparison, positive affect initially increased in unipolar and healthy subjects, while in bipolar patients no significant change in positive affect was observed. Implicit self-esteem generally showed an unexpected decrease regardless of the comparison condition and group. Remitted bipolar patients seemed to be less sensitive to positive feedback which may reflect 'dampening' of positive affect which has been observed before in bipolar patients.
ObjectiveHere, we examine whether the dynamics of the four dimensions of the circumplex model of affect assessed by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) differ among those with bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD).MethodsParticipants aged 11–85 years (n = 362) reported momentary sad, anxious, active, and energetic dimensional states four times per day for 2 weeks. Individuals with lifetime mood disorder subtypes of bipolar‐I, bipolar‐II, and MDD derived from a semistructured clinical interview were compared to each other and to controls without a lifetime history of psychiatric disorders. Random effects from individual means, inertias, innovation (residual) variances, and cross‐lags across the four affective dimensions simultaneously were derived from multivariate dynamic structural equation models.ResultsAll mood disorder subtypes were associated with higher levels of sad and anxious mood and lower energy than controls. Those with bipolar‐I had lower average activation, and lower energy that was independent of activation, compared to MDD or controls. However, increases in activation were more likely to perpetuate in those with bipolar‐I. Bipolar‐II was characterized by higher lability of sad and anxious mood compared to bipolar‐I and controls but not MDD. Compared to BD and controls, those with MDD exhibited cross‐augmentation of sadness and anxiety, and sadness blunted energy.ConclusionBipolar‐I is more strongly characterized by activation and energy than sad and anxious mood. This distinction has potential implications for both specificity of intervention targets and differential pathways underlying these dynamic affective systems. Confirmation of the longer term stability and generalizability of these findings in future studies is necessary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.