Stability of implants placed in fresh sockets versus healed alveolar sites: Early findings

Abstract

The stabilities of the implants placed in the fresh sockets and in healed sites exhibited similar evolutions in ISQ values and thus osseointegration; however, the implants in the healed alveolar sites exhibited superior values at all time points.

Retracted: A new cervical implant design compared with standard design in order to increase peri‐implant hard and soft tissue behavior: histomorphometric and histological study in dogs

“…Using resonance frequency analysis (RFA), it is now possible to measure the ISQ at any time during the course of implant treatment and loading (Meredith et al 1996;da Silva Neto et al 2013;Gehrke et al 2016). Using ISQ values as a parameter to assess the tested implants is noninvasive.…”

Influence of Mucosal Thickness, Implant Dimensions and Stability in Cone Morse Implant Installed at Subcrestal Bone Level on the Peri-Implant Bone: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study

“…In this sense, more precise and non-invasive techniques were developed. These analyzes are called according to the method by which they are performed, i.e., resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and are used to verify and measure the stability of implants installed in bone tissue at different clinical periods [30,31]. The use of this technique is mainly based on being easy to perform, fast, and direct and, moreover, can be applied routinely in the clinic because it does not present discomfort to the patient.…”

Stability and Crestal Bone Behavior Following Simultaneous Placement of Multiple Dental Implants (Two or More) with the Bone Splitting Technique: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation

“…In all cases, the values of the present study (which used conical implants) were higher than those reported in the aforementioned study (which used cylindrical implants); this difference may be due to the different types of implants used. However, we observed that the average values were significantly increased after 90 and 150 days …”

“…However, we observed that the average values were significantly increased after 90 and 150 days. 25 Some authors have suggested that the use of longer and wider implants increases primary stability due to increased bone-implant contact surface area. [26][27][28] In the present study, only the length of the implant (10, 11, and 13 mm) was used as an evaluation factor rather than the implant design and diameter because all of the implants used were 3.5 mm in diameter and an internal hexagon.…”