2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and monotonicity in newsvendor situations

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis study considers a supply chain that consists of n retailers, each of them facing a newsvendor problem, and a supplier. Groups of retailers might increase their expected joint profit by joint ordering and inventory centralization. However, we assume that the retailers impose some level of stock that should be dedicated to them. In this situation, we show that the associated cooperative game has a non-empty core. Afterwards, we concentrate on a dynamic situation, where several model cost para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2005) and Özen et al. 2006, 2008, 2012. These papers model efficient capacity reallocation among players at the same echelon while we study capacity reallocation facilitated by a common supplier in a two‐echelon supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2005) and Özen et al. 2006, 2008, 2012. These papers model efficient capacity reallocation among players at the same echelon while we study capacity reallocation facilitated by a common supplier in a two‐echelon supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A large stream of research has associated organizational structure and stability with the degree of (de)centralization of authority (Van De Panne, 1991; Özen et al , 2012; Strebinger and Treiblmaier, 2004). Previous research has extended the scope of interest from single organizations toward complex SCs (Nagarajan and Bassok, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2000s, much of the extensive effort on the NVP has focused on topics concerning pricing strategies (Agrawal and Seshadri, ; Khouja, ; Petruzzi and Dada, ; Monahan et al., ; Arcelus et al., , ; Chen, ; Salinger and Ampudia, ; Hua et al., ) or supply chain management (Lariviere and Porteus, ; Shang and Song, ; Cachon, ; Liu et al., ; Weng, ; Raz and Porteus, ; Özer et al., ; Lau et al., ; Chen, ; Chen and Bell, ; Kouvelis and Zhao, ; Shi et al., ; Özen, et al, ). There are other extensions of the NVP that target value‐at‐risk considerations (Ahmed et al., ; Cheng et al., ; Özler et al., ; Wang et al., ; Jammernegg and Kischka, ; Choi and Ruszczyński, ; Kouvelis and Zhao, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%