2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.224415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and magnetic properties of Fe double layers on Ir (111)

Abstract: We investigate the interplay between the structural reconstruction and the magnetic properties of Fe doublelayers on Ir (111)-substrate using first-principles calculations based on density functional theory and mapping of the total energies on an atomistic spin model. We show that, if a second Fe monolayer is deposited on Fe/Ir (111), the stacking may change from hexagonal close-packed to bcc (110)-like accompanied by a reduction of symmetry from trigonal to centered rectangular. Although the bcc-like surface … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the magnetic case, all mentioned interactions pertain to bulk iron and have been taken from classic references (Kittel, 1966) except the DM coupling, for which we cite the maximum (large) values estimated by electronic-structure calculations of the Fe=Irð111Þ interface (Dupé et al, 2018). In the electric case the dipole-dipole energy is evaluated based on standard polarization and volume data for PbTiO 3 (Bilc et al, 2008) and recalling that ϵ ∞ ≈ 8.6 for this compound (Zhong, King-Smith, and Vanderbilt, 1994); the short-range interaction energy is evaluated taking into account the harmonic interatomic constants reported by Ghosez et al (1999) for nearest neighbor Pb cations; the anisotropy energy is derived from the computed energy difference between the tetragonal and rhombohedral ferroelectric polymorphs of PbTiO 3 ; see King-Smith and Vanderbilt (1994).…”
Section: Magnetic Versus Polar Systems: Differences and Analogies At ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the magnetic case, all mentioned interactions pertain to bulk iron and have been taken from classic references (Kittel, 1966) except the DM coupling, for which we cite the maximum (large) values estimated by electronic-structure calculations of the Fe=Irð111Þ interface (Dupé et al, 2018). In the electric case the dipole-dipole energy is evaluated based on standard polarization and volume data for PbTiO 3 (Bilc et al, 2008) and recalling that ϵ ∞ ≈ 8.6 for this compound (Zhong, King-Smith, and Vanderbilt, 1994); the short-range interaction energy is evaluated taking into account the harmonic interatomic constants reported by Ghosez et al (1999) for nearest neighbor Pb cations; the anisotropy energy is derived from the computed energy difference between the tetragonal and rhombohedral ferroelectric polymorphs of PbTiO 3 ; see King-Smith and Vanderbilt (1994).…”
Section: Magnetic Versus Polar Systems: Differences and Analogies At ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We address initially the two-dimensional Bloch spectral function of fcc-Pd/Fe/Ir(111) surface and discuss the nature of the different unoccupied states showing high intensity at Γ, the center of the two-dimensional Brillouin zone. By investigating the case of bare fcc-Fe/Ir(111) surface, which was shown to host a lattice of skyrmions in its ground state [32][33][34], and considering thicker Pd films deposited on that surface, we aim at distinguishing the states stemming from Pd. Our conclusions are summarized in the last section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%