2017
DOI: 10.1080/1536383x.2017.1389905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and electronic properties of armchair boron nitride/carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All values are considerable negative values, (i.e., about − 7.0 to − 7.9 eV/atom), which confirm the stability of the constructed nanotubes. The E coh at PBE-PBE/6-31G* level of theory for BNNT(5,5) was also found to be − 7.60 eV/atom, which is fully in agreement with the previous reported value of − 7.59 eV/atom obtained by HSEh1PBE/6–31g(d) method 47 . The values obtained from PBE-PBE functionals is ~ − 0.43 eV/atom more negative than the B3LYP results, which may be due to the more contribution of the Hartree–Fock exchange correlation in PBE-PBE compared to the B3LYP functional.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All values are considerable negative values, (i.e., about − 7.0 to − 7.9 eV/atom), which confirm the stability of the constructed nanotubes. The E coh at PBE-PBE/6-31G* level of theory for BNNT(5,5) was also found to be − 7.60 eV/atom, which is fully in agreement with the previous reported value of − 7.59 eV/atom obtained by HSEh1PBE/6–31g(d) method 47 . The values obtained from PBE-PBE functionals is ~ − 0.43 eV/atom more negative than the B3LYP results, which may be due to the more contribution of the Hartree–Fock exchange correlation in PBE-PBE compared to the B3LYP functional.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Different values of HLG were reported in the literature for armchair BNNT(5,5), which are depends on the size of the nanotube and the applied DFT methods. As examples, the value of 5.81 eV for B 75 N 75 H 20 nanotube using HSE1PBE/6-31G method were reported by Rodríguez Juárez et al 47 . Where, the value of 4.492 eV were reported by Doust Mohammadi and Abdullah 53 for B 20 N 20 armchair BNNT(5,5) at PBE0/6-311G(d) level of theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, the values of of AlNNT, BNNT, and CNT equal 4.644, 5.735, and 0.695 eV, respectively, and reduced considerably due to encapsulation of E3 and K2 forms of FAV drug; similar observation was found in literature [ 16 , 61 , 62 ]; the difference is not less than 1.11, 2.33, and 0.08 eV, respectively. However, since the current study used the zig-zag tube (10,0), values of BNNT and CNT are compared to those of the armchair tubes (5.5), (5.81), and (0.41) eV, respectively, of the study [ 80 ]. In other words, the decrease in energy gaps can be expressed by the term (see Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bader charge (Q) analysis gives the information whether or not the base material acts as a donor or acceptor . Moreover, the majority of the adsorption site shows the positive value of Q that denotes the charge transfer from formaldehyde molecule to δ‐P.…”
Section: Outcomes and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%