IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2011.6161273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and convergence analysis for a class of nonlinear passive systems

Abstract: A systematic and general method that proves state boundedness and convergence to nonzero equilibrium for a class of nonlinear passive systems with constant external inputs is developed. First, making use of the method of linear-timevarying approximations, the boundedness of the nonlinear system states is proven. Next, taking advantage of the passivity property, it is proven that a suitable switching storage function can be always obtained to show convergence to the nonzero equilibrium by using LaSalle's Invari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the complete stability proof and the sequence of the intermediate stages is as follows: (1) System (20) is examined for the input-to-state (ISS) stability property, since the ISS property implies BIBS stability [27,28]. The analysis follows Theorem A.1 [31] (Appendix B), and requires a suitable Lyapunov function to be analytically determined for the 11th-order closed-loop system; (2) In the second stage, the task is to prove convergence to a steady state equilibrium x * , different to zero, by applying the advanced analysis given in [32,33], and in particular Theorem A.2, under Assumptions A.1 and A.2, given in Appendix B, as well.…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of the Nonlinear Closed-loop Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the complete stability proof and the sequence of the intermediate stages is as follows: (1) System (20) is examined for the input-to-state (ISS) stability property, since the ISS property implies BIBS stability [27,28]. The analysis follows Theorem A.1 [31] (Appendix B), and requires a suitable Lyapunov function to be analytically determined for the 11th-order closed-loop system; (2) In the second stage, the task is to prove convergence to a steady state equilibrium x * , different to zero, by applying the advanced analysis given in [32,33], and in particular Theorem A.2, under Assumptions A.1 and A.2, given in Appendix B, as well.…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of the Nonlinear Closed-loop Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, since (22) holds true, system (20) is found to be strictly passive. As a result, assuming the external input to be constant or piecewise constant, and taking state boundedness and passivity into account, then Assumptions A.1 and A.2 and Theorem A.2 [32,33], as given in Appendix B, are satisfied. Hence, convergence to non-zero equilibrium is proven [32,33].…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of the Nonlinear Closed-loop Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A contr (16) with A contr given by (11) Let the unforced closed-loop system (17), i.e. the system without the external input (u = 0):…”
Section: X3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, according to the analysis already discussed, system (22) is ISS, we can further apply Theorem 3 as given by the authors in [17] because all the other Assumptions mentioned in [17] are satisfied. Under these conditions, it becomes clear from [17] that there always exists a suitable storage function for system (22) with a constant external input u = Urn satisfying Theorem 3.…”
Section: X3mentioning
confidence: 99%