2016
DOI: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence)

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies met eligibility for inclusion and reported interventional studies related to teamwork, delegation and communication. Both reviewers utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to evaluate the quality of the empirical studies and the SQUIRE 2.0 (Ogrinc et al, 2016) to evaluate quality improvement studies. The MMAT is designed for the appraisal stage of systematic mixed‐studies review to determine the value of the article (Hong, Gonzalez‐Reyes, & Pluye, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seven studies met eligibility for inclusion and reported interventional studies related to teamwork, delegation and communication. Both reviewers utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to evaluate the quality of the empirical studies and the SQUIRE 2.0 (Ogrinc et al, 2016) to evaluate quality improvement studies. The MMAT is designed for the appraisal stage of systematic mixed‐studies review to determine the value of the article (Hong, Gonzalez‐Reyes, & Pluye, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMAT is designed for the appraisal stage of systematic mixed‐studies review to determine the value of the article (Hong, Gonzalez‐Reyes, & Pluye, 2018). The SQUIRE 2.0 tool is used to evaluate quality improvement articles (Ogrinc et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of Laguna et al [ 37 ] concludes that the leading causes of falls are related, in addition to age, to preoperative and postoperative status, neurological diseases, and medication. It is known that surgical patients have a higher risk of falling [ 7 , 37 , 38 ]. In the studied sample, the number of patients with the risk factor of surgical intervention was five times higher in the intervention group; despite this, there was only one fall in surgical patients in the intervention group, which reinforces the benefit of the educational program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation study of a health quality improvement strategy whose description met the standards of the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE Guidelines). 12 In relation to the methodological design, this is a mixed method research anchored in the sequential exploratory design. This study design is carried out by a first qualitative stage: data connection -between the qualitative data analysis end and the quantitative data collection -and subsequent quantitative stage, besides the final joint analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%