2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3713-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move?

Abstract: It has been repeatedly shown that specific brain activity related to planning movement develops before the conscious intention to act. This empirical finding strongly challenges the notion of free will. Here, we demonstrate that in the Libet experiment, spontaneous fluctuations of the slow electro-cortical potentials (SCPs) account for a significant fraction of the readiness potential (RP). The individual potential shifts preceding self-initiated movements were classified as showing a negative or positive shif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
42
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other experiments corroborate these findings (JO et al, 2013;SCHLEGEL et al, 2013;HERRMANN et al, 2008). For instance, Trevena and Miller (2010) developed a Libet style experiment in which participants heard a random tone after which they should decide to move or not to move (experiment 1).…”
Section: Some Possibilitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other experiments corroborate these findings (JO et al, 2013;SCHLEGEL et al, 2013;HERRMANN et al, 2008). For instance, Trevena and Miller (2010) developed a Libet style experiment in which participants heard a random tone after which they should decide to move or not to move (experiment 1).…”
Section: Some Possibilitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Since the activity was observed before action, it became widely accepted that it represented preparation for the action, and Wegner seems to accept this conception. New evidence, however, suggests that the RP cannot be treated as preparation for the movement, and therefore does not reliably show that unconscious brain preparation to move precedes the ESA in the causal production of the action (SCHURGER et al, 2012;JO et al, 2013;SCHLEGEL et al, 2013;TREVENA;MILLER, 2010;HERRMANN et al, 2008).…”
Section: Rp Is Not Preparation For the Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short time since the stochastic decision model was first introduced (Schurger et al 2012), other studies have emerged providing evidence that ongoing stochastic variability might play a role in the choice of action (Bengson et al 2014) and might account for the shape of the readiness potential (Jo et al 2013). The model offers a parsimonious explanation of the mechanisms underlying 'when' a pre-specified action is initiated.…”
Section: Evidence For a Late Rather Than Early Neural Decision To Movementioning
confidence: 95%
“…EEG signal can be classified as two types depending on the generation of the bran signals such as Event related potentials (ERPs) [144] and Spontaneous or freerunning EEG [118].…”
Section: Eeg Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%