Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00702855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous and induced chromosomal instability in Werner syndrome

Abstract: In extension of a previous study, spontaneous and clastogen-induced chromosome damage was analyzed in cultures of peripheral blood lymphocytes from six further patients with Werner syndrome (WS) and six healthy controls. In addition, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) was estimated in four of these cases. Lymphocytes of patients with various other diseases were used for another series of control experiments. Diepoxybutane (DEB), 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO), and bleomycin (BLM) were the standard clastogens thro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 A and B and Table 1). This result is in accordance with previously published studies, mostly carried out in WS patient lymphocytes, where large deletions, breaks, and reciprocal translocations were reported (6,7,26). The appearance of these chromosomal aberrations is also consistent with the formation of chromosome fusions quickly after suppression of DNA damage checkpoints in WS cells.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3 A and B and Table 1). This result is in accordance with previously published studies, mostly carried out in WS patient lymphocytes, where large deletions, breaks, and reciprocal translocations were reported (6,7,26). The appearance of these chromosomal aberrations is also consistent with the formation of chromosome fusions quickly after suppression of DNA damage checkpoints in WS cells.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This observation is consistent with the possibility that in the absence of active WRN the spontaneous damage at the replication fork cannot be resolved properly, leading to recruitment of HR molecular apparatus. In addition, persistence of DNA strand breaks in WS cells could be consistent with the observed higher rate of DNA rearrangements (Gebhart et al, 1988;Fukuchi et al, 1989). Furthermore, a possible consequence of this higher yield of DNA strand breaks is that the effect of the reported interruption of RNA synthesis by CPT, which results in an SSB in the transcribed strand (Barrows et al, 1998;Mosesso et al, 2000), combined with one gap in the other strand, could lead to cytotoxic DSB in G2 cells, thus resulting in cell death.…”
Section: Lack Of Functional Wrn Protein Results In Higher Spontaneoussupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Noteworthy, yeast mutants in such RecQ-like helicases are extremely sensitive to agents that cause replication arrest, such as hydroxyurea because of uncontrolled illegitimate recombinational events (Stewart et al, 1997;Yamagata et al, 1998). The observed sensitivity of WS cells to 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (Gebhart et al, 1988;Ogburn et al, 1997) has prompted a search for sensitivity toward drugs that interfere with DNA replication and transcription. More recently, the finding that WS cells show sensitivity to camptothecin, an agent that produces replication-dependent DNA damage, reinforces the hypothesis that WRN functions mainly during the DNA replication processes (Lebel and Leder, 1998;Poot et al, 1999;Pichierri et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanism underlying the 4NQO sensitivity of WS cell lines is not known. 4NQO produces bulky DNA adducts, oxidative damage, and strand breaks (Gebhart et al, 1988), and the lesions are generally thought to be repaired by NER (Jones et al, 1989). 4NQO has often been referred to as a UV mimetic, and 66 genes overlapped between the 4NQO and UV response vs 15 between 4NQO and g-irradiation (see Supplementary Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%