2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-015-1031-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splanchnic tissues respond differently when piglets are offered a diet 30 % deficient in total sulfur amino acid for 10 days

Abstract: A greater nutritional priority appears to be given to splanchnic tissues so that its growth and protein metabolism can be maintained when the TSAA supply is limiting. The amino acid composition, glutathione status, and intestinal mucosa architecture are affected in a tissue-dependent manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, high AA efficiency of utilization might result from the fact that these efficiencies values were obtained through a back calculation using the observed PD in the pigs but assuming the Lys concentration constant as 6.9% of the protein. This constant AA concentration in protein seems to be an invalid assumption, given that protein and energy levels [39], age [11], sulfur AA deficiency [12, 40], Thr deficiency [13] or excess, and genetics [41] can change body AA composition. The most metabolically efficient pigs may use several mechanisms, such as decreased protein degradation, increased AA absorption in the small intestinal tissue, and increased absorption of AAs from plasma proteins, to cope with lower AA intake, thereby contributing to the higher AA efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, high AA efficiency of utilization might result from the fact that these efficiencies values were obtained through a back calculation using the observed PD in the pigs but assuming the Lys concentration constant as 6.9% of the protein. This constant AA concentration in protein seems to be an invalid assumption, given that protein and energy levels [39], age [11], sulfur AA deficiency [12, 40], Thr deficiency [13] or excess, and genetics [41] can change body AA composition. The most metabolically efficient pigs may use several mechanisms, such as decreased protein degradation, increased AA absorption in the small intestinal tissue, and increased absorption of AAs from plasma proteins, to cope with lower AA intake, thereby contributing to the higher AA efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threonine (Thr) is often the second-limiting AA in conventional commercial diets, and feeding pigs AA deficient diets limit protein deposition (PD) and affects tissue protein composition [11, 12]. Thus, Thr deficiency might lead to the synthesis of proteins with less Thr and a reduction of the Thr concentration in the overall body muscles [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livestock husbandry practices have prompted an expanded use of synthetic amino acids in animal diets to enhance the performance and carcass quality of livestock, as well as to minimize the environmental impact caused by nitrogen excretion [1][2][3][4]. This is true for methionine, which is an essential amino acid for all livestock species, and it is the first limiting amino acid in diets for poultry and the second or third limiting amino acid in the corn-soybean meal diets for pigs [5,6]. Methionine is not only used for protein synthesis, but it is also involved in the methylation reactions of DNA [7,8] and in choline metabolism [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dietary supplementation of methionine was found to improve intestinal integrity in weanling piglets (Chen et al 2014). Additionally, the growth and development of the small intestine could be damaged by sulfur amino acid deficiency, as reported by the previous studies (Conde-Aguilera et al 2016). Sulfur amino acid deficiency also decreased antioxidant capacity in piglets by reducing GSH and cysteine concentrations (Bauchart-Thevret et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%