“…The current study first identified a considerable diversity of intestinal parasites from free‐ranging canids in the study area and Nepal. The current prevalence rate of intestinal parasites (95.7%; n = 332) was on par with the report of stray canids from Bangladesh (95%; n = 60) (Das et al., 2012), lower than from Ethiopia (100%; n = 13) (Jones et al., 2011) and India (99%; n = 101) (Traub et al., 2014) but was higher than from Nepal (56.2%–78.5%; n = 105–157) (Satyal et al., 2013; Yadav & Shrestha, 2017), India (90.7%; n = 108) (Sudan et al., 2015), South Africa (82.5%; n = 240) (Mukaratirwa & Singh, 2010), Malaysia (87.7%, n = 77 to 88.3%, n = 227) (Ngui et al., 2014; Tun et al., 2015) and Vietnam (55.5%, n = 200) (Ng‐Nguyen et al., 2015). It indicates that the prevalence rate of intestinal parasites is different in different countries; these variations might be due to the difference in geo‐climatic factors, sample size, sampling breed, sampling season, treatment strategy and methodological contrasts.…”