The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcy092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Spiritual Risk’: A Parental Perception of Risk for Children in the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Community

Abstract: This article addresses child protection in close-knit religious communities. Specifically, it presents the findings of a qualitative research project that examined Ultra-Orthodox Jewish parents’ perceptions and ascribed meanings of child risk and protection based on fifty in-depth interviews with parents from Israel and the USA. Here, we hone in on one key theme that emerged from our analysis of the interviews, which the interviewees themselves referred to as ‘spiritual risk’. ‘Spiritual risk’ is a complex con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas participants perceived the receiving of parental love as a crucial precondition for the ability to love the Torah and God and live religious lives, lack of parental love was viewed as a factor that can lead to a loss of faith to the point of leaving the community altogether. These findings lend support to our previous conceptualization of ‘spiritual risk’ (Nadan et al, 2019)—a construct envisioned by Ultra‐Orthodox parents that encompasses three interrelated dimensions: (1) a decline in observance of the Torah and the commandments; (2) violation of sociocultural norms and rules; and (3) a decline in spiritual beliefs, including the individual's sense of connection to God. ‘Spiritual risk’ can manifest itself in a decline in the level of spirituality and religious observance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas participants perceived the receiving of parental love as a crucial precondition for the ability to love the Torah and God and live religious lives, lack of parental love was viewed as a factor that can lead to a loss of faith to the point of leaving the community altogether. These findings lend support to our previous conceptualization of ‘spiritual risk’ (Nadan et al, 2019)—a construct envisioned by Ultra‐Orthodox parents that encompasses three interrelated dimensions: (1) a decline in observance of the Torah and the commandments; (2) violation of sociocultural norms and rules; and (3) a decline in spiritual beliefs, including the individual's sense of connection to God. ‘Spiritual risk’ can manifest itself in a decline in the level of spirituality and religious observance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, the concept of “spiritual risk” was clearly articulated in our interviews with Ultra‐Orthodox parents (Nadan et al, 2019) and children (Nadan & Ganz, 2018) as one of the most significant risks for children. In the eyes of the Ultra‐Orthodox community, “spiritual risk” is a complex construct comprising three interrelated dimensions: (a) a decline in observance of the Torah and the commandments; (b) violation of sociocultural norms and rules; and (c) a decline in spiritual beliefs, including the individual's sense of connection with G‐d.…”
Section: The Role Of Contexts In the Understanding Of Child Risk And mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a study among Ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities, for example, parents spoke of 'spiritual risk' as the major concern for their children. However, social workers from outside the community did not consider spirituality as a risk category for children (Nadan & Ganz, 2018). Gaps may include discrepancies and contradictions concerning the nature of the relationship between families and social workers and a gulf in perceptions regarding needs, assistance and help, as well as the process of risk assessment and child protection practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%