2020
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spiritual leadership, job Satisfaction, and its effect on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on COR theory, our findings signify that spiritual leadership, through vision, altruistic love and hope/ faith, enhances employees' several personal resources, such as their sense of autonomy, spiritual wellbeing, intrinsic motivation and autonomous motivation that negatively influence employees' negative attachment with the organization. In so doing, the work at hand also responds to the recent research calls (Ali et al, 2020a;Usman et al, 2021b) to add Second, by empirically revealing a significant negative relationship between spiritual leadership and alienative commitment, the present study extends the literature on organizational commitment that has mainly focused on the positive aspects of commitment, such as affective and instrumental forms of commitment (Djaelani et al, 2021;Fry et al, 2005). The present work markedly deviates from and contributes to the existing literature on organizational commitment (Ruiz-Palomo et al, 2020) by focusing on the negative affective commitment that has serious negative consequences for the employees and organizations.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on COR theory, our findings signify that spiritual leadership, through vision, altruistic love and hope/ faith, enhances employees' several personal resources, such as their sense of autonomy, spiritual wellbeing, intrinsic motivation and autonomous motivation that negatively influence employees' negative attachment with the organization. In so doing, the work at hand also responds to the recent research calls (Ali et al, 2020a;Usman et al, 2021b) to add Second, by empirically revealing a significant negative relationship between spiritual leadership and alienative commitment, the present study extends the literature on organizational commitment that has mainly focused on the positive aspects of commitment, such as affective and instrumental forms of commitment (Djaelani et al, 2021;Fry et al, 2005). The present work markedly deviates from and contributes to the existing literature on organizational commitment (Ruiz-Palomo et al, 2020) by focusing on the negative affective commitment that has serious negative consequences for the employees and organizations.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The finding has opened a new scholarly debate that would draw their attention to revisit a form of organizational commitment that has largely been glossed over in the conventional commitment literature. Second, the present study extends the literature on the spiritual leadership-commitment relationship (Djaelani et al, 2021;Fry et al, 2005) by offering a more nuanced understanding of this relationship by focusing on the negative aspects of employee commitment to the organization and thus enhance the nomological network of the outcomes of spiritual leadership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Contrary to this, job satisfaction results in increased productivity as well as boosting-up of inherent humanitarian value ( Oshagbemi, 2013 ). Further, job satisfaction decreases absenteeism ( Hardy et al, 2003 ; Adekanmbi and Ukpere, 2020 ), reduces counter-productive work behaviors ( Meier and Spector, 2013 ), enhances life satisfaction ( Judge et al, 2000 ; Viseu et al, 2020 ), and OCB ( Organ and Ryan, 1995 ; Djaelani et al, 2021 ), leading toward higher firm performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SL is acknowledged as one of the most dominant factors at the workplace for intrinsically motivating employees with a leader's vision, hope and altruist love (Fry, 2003), which further leads to the emotional attachment of employees with work. In congruence with the theory of organizational support, as organizational care increases the level of AC also upsurges, compelling individuals to reciprocate (Lee and Peccei, 2007; Djaelani et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%