1966
DOI: 10.2307/2796794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirit Possession and Deprivation Cults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The participation of women in the spirit world is, however, not unique to the Duruma. Lewis (1966) has cited several communities in which women are the main participants of healing rituals as patients, healers, aides, or observers. He, however, does not link women's participation to their children's health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participation of women in the spirit world is, however, not unique to the Duruma. Lewis (1966) has cited several communities in which women are the main participants of healing rituals as patients, healers, aides, or observers. He, however, does not link women's participation to their children's health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some scholars, the zar cult was originally introduced into the Egyptian Turkish upper class harems by Abyssinian and Sudanese slaves during the latter part of the 19th century (Cerulli, 1927(Cerulli, :1217 In recent years several publications have appeared explaining the zar ceremony from the perspective of functionalism. That is, these authors see the zar serving the function of a therapeutic outlet for women who suffer from the social and psychological pressures of a submerged social status (Messing, 1959;Lewis, 1966;Kennedy, 1967). What has been overlooked in this search for functional explanations is the view that the zar symbolises more fundamental motifs of the culture, that is (as a symbolic act) the zar expresses basic conceptions of self and the world including the entire realm of the man-woman relationship much as do other symbolic acts like seclusion or the modesty code (Antoun, 1968;Nelson, 1969).…”
Section: Self Spirit Possession and World Viewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clearly, these syndromes also have personal meaning and ameliorative functions for the characteristically socially weak protagonists, who can thereby regulate their circumstances in otherwise uncontrollable and generally depriving or oppressive conditions. This outcome can be achieved by invoking consensual, often sanctified community beliefs [92]. In more individualistic and modern societies, most oppressive structures operate within the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%