Spinal Deformity in Patients With Sotos Syndrome (Cerebral Gigantism)

Katoh

et al. 2020

Spine

Study Design. A retrospective comparative study.Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the NSD1 abnormalities in patients diagnosed with Sotos syndrome and its correlation with the presence, severity, and progression of associated scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis has been reported in approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with Sotos syndrome, a genetic disorder characterized by a distinctive facial appearance, learning disability, and overgrowth. Sotos syndrome is mainly attributed to NSD1 haploinsufficiency, but with ethnical differences in genetic profile: NSD1 microdeletions are frequently identified in Japanese Sotos patients whereas intragenic mutations are more frequently found in non-Japanese patients. Although possible genotype-phenotype correlations have been proposed, the genotype of Sotos syndrome patients suffering from scoliosis has not been examined. Methods. The medical records and spinal radiographs of 63 consecutive Sotos syndrome patients at a single center were reviewed. Fluorescent in situ hybridization or microarray comparative genomic hybridization and DNA sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were performed to detect 5q35 microdeletion involving the NSD1 gene and intragenic mutations of the NSD1 gene, respectively. The phenotypes of all cases and radiological assessments for the presence and progression of scoliosis were studied. Results. NSD1 abnormalities were identified in 55 patients (87%): microdeletion in 34 patients (54%) and intragenic mutation in 22 patients (33%). Scoliosis was observed in 26 patients (41%), with a significantly higher ratio of microdeletions than mutations. The 10 patients with progressive scoliosis all had NSD1 microdeletions. Conclusion. Scoliosis was a common phenotypical trait in children with Sotos syndrome and its presence as well as progression were higher in cases with NSD1 microdeletions. Although all Sotos syndrome patients should be monitored for scoliosis, clinicians should be made aware that patients with NSD1 microdeletions have a higher probability of scoliosis development and progression that may require early intervention.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Association of Scoliosis and NSD1 Gene Deletion in Sotos Syndrome Patients

Katoh

et al. 2020

Spine

“…Most of our patients underwent surgical treatment. In the literature there are reports where majority of patients did not require surgery [8][9][10]; however Tsirikos et al [4] recently reported five patients with Sotos syndrome that required surgical treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The disorder is associated with developmental delay, hypotonia, joint hyperextensibility and behavioral and learning disturbances often with mild mental retardation. Hypotonia, joint hyperextensibility and excessive growth in childhood are the main features of the syndrome [4][5][6]. The incidence of Sotos syndrome is 1/10,000-1/15,000 live births with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sotos syndrome and scoliosis surgical treatment: a 10-year follow-up

et al. 2011

Sotos syndrome is caused by a gene deletion with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Cerebral gigantism, hypotonia and joint hyperextensibility are characteristic features of this syndrome. A percentage of these patients develop progressive scoliosis early in life. In the literature, few studies on the evolution of scoliosis in Sotos syndrome have been published. We retrospectively evaluated eight patients diagnosed with Sotos syndrome and scoliosis treated at the Garrahan Children Hospital between 1988 and March 2009. Clinical charts and imaging studies were assessed. Eight patients (19%) presented with scoliosis and seven of them (87.5%) required surgical treatment. The mean follow-up was 9.5 years (range 3-18). Mean age at first consultation was 5.2 years (range 1.1-11.2). Mean Cobb angle for scoliosis at first consultation was 34.3° (range 20°-42°) and the mean Cobb angle for kyphosis was 45.6° (range 30°-90°). Mean age at surgery was 11.2 years (range 3.7-18.10). The surgical procedures performed were instrumented posterior arthrodesis, alone or combined with anterior arthrodesis, instrumented anterior arthrodesis, while one patient is currently in treatment with growing rods. Preoperative mean Cobb angle for scoliosis was 72.3° (range 54°-130°) and for kyphosis was 59.8° (range 30°-108°); postoperative mean Cobb angle for scoliosis was 45.5° (range 6°-90°) and for kyphosis was 40.2° (range 30°-80°). There were three early complications (pleural effusion in two cases and death due to sepsis in one) and two late complications (kyphosis above the instrumentation area and dislodgement of the proximal hooks). Incidence of scoliosis in Sotos syndrome is high and thus close monitoring of patients with Sotos syndrome during growth is important for early detection of this entity. Joint hyperextensibility and hypotonia that are characteristic of the syndrome should be considered at the moment of surgery to avoid short fusions.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

Spinal Deformity in Sotos Syndrome: First Results of Growth-friendly Spine Surgery

Glotzbecker

Marks

Birch

et al. 2020

Background: Sotos syndrome (SS), or cerebral gigantism, describes children with macrocephaly, craniofacial abnormalities, general overgrowth, ligamentous laxity, developmental delay, and neurological disabilities. Fewer than 500 cases have been reported since Sotos and colleagues described the condition in 1964 and no literature exists on the management of spinal deformity in children under 10 years old. The aims of this study were: (1) to characterize the presentation of spinal deformities in patients with SS; and (2) to provide preliminary results of growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI) in these children. Methods: Thirteen children (9 boys) with SS and minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified from 2 multicenter early-onset scoliosis (EOS) databases (1997-2017). Mean age at index surgery and follow-up duration were 5.0 years (range, 1.8 to 10 y) and 7.2 years (range, 2.1 to 14.9 y), respectively. Patients underwent GFI for a mean of 5.7 years (range, 2 to 10.2 y), with an average of 9 lengthenings (range, 2 to 18). Definitive spinal fusion was performed in 4 patients (31%). Major curve magnitude, T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis were evaluated preindex, postindex, latest GFI, and postfusion, when possible. Results: Five thoracolumbar (38%), 4 double major (31%), 2 main thoracic (15%), and 2 double thoracic curves (15%) were seen that spanned a mean of 6.8 levels (5 to 9). Major curves improved 36% (range, 5% to 71%), from a mean of 71 degrees (range, 48 to 90 degrees) to 46 degrees (range, 20 to 73 degrees) postindex surgery (P<0.001). Major curves remained stable at a mean of 52 degrees (range, 20 to 87 degrees) at latest GFI (P=0.36). True T1-T12 and T1-S1 growth velocities during GFI were 0.5 mm/mo (range, 0.4 to 0.8 mm/mo) and 0.8 mm/mo (range, 0.1 to 2.1 mm/mo), respectively. Twenty-six complications occurred in 9 patients (69%) averaging 2 complications per patient (range, 0 to 7). Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the outcomes of GFI in children with SS and EOS. Compared with published data for outcomes of GFI in EOS, children with SS may have less major curve correction. Growth-friendly surgery remains an effective treatment method for EOS in patients with SS. Levels of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective case-series.