Spinal cord bypass surgery using peripheral nerve transfers: review of translational studies and a case report on its use following complete spinal cord injury in a human
Abstract:Spinal cord injury has been studied in a variety of in vitro and in vivo animal models. One promising therapeutic approach involves the transfer of peripheral nerves originating above the level of injury into the spinal cord below the level of injury. A model of spinal cord injury in rodents has shown the growth of peripheral nerve fibers into the spinal cord, with the subsequent development of functional synaptic connections and limb movement. The authors of this paper are currently developing a simil… Show more
“…Nerve transfer surgery improves function in patients with PNI [15]. Extrapolation of this well-established surgical technique for those with cervical SCI is a valid approach to augment upper extremity function [6–8, 16, 23, 28, 36]. These preliminary results suggest that sacrifice of the brachialis, which is a redundant elbow flexor, does not significantly downgrade function in this uniquely vulnerable patient population.…”
Background Peripheral nerve transfers are being used to improve upper extremity function in cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and perioperative complications following these procedures. Methods Eligible SCI patients with upper extremity dysfunction were assessed and followed for a minimum of 3 months after surgery. Data regarding demographics, medical history, physical examination, electrodiagnostic testing, intraoperative nerve stimulation, recipient nerve histomorphometry, surgical procedure, and complications were collected. Results Seven patients had surgery on eight limbs, mean age of 28±9.9 years and mean time from SCI injury of 5.1± 5.2 years. All patients had volitional elbow flexion and no volitional hand function. The nerve to the brachialis muscle was used as the expendable donor, and the recipients included the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) (for volitional prehension), nerve branches to the flexor carpi radialis, and flexor digitorum superficialis. Two patients underwent additional nerve transfers: (1) supinator to extensor carpi ulnaris or (2) deltoid to triceps. No patients had any loss of baseline upper extremity function, seven of eight AIN nerve specimens had preserved micro-architecture, and all intraoperative stimulation of recipient neuromuscular units was successful further supporting feasibility. Four patients had perioperative complications; all resolved or improved (paresthesias). Conclusion Nerve transfers can be used to reestablish volitional control of hand function in SCI. This surgery does not downgrade existing function, uses expendable donor nerve, and has no postoperative immobilization, which might make it a more viable option than traditional tendon transfer and other procedures.
“…Nerve transfer surgery improves function in patients with PNI [15]. Extrapolation of this well-established surgical technique for those with cervical SCI is a valid approach to augment upper extremity function [6–8, 16, 23, 28, 36]. These preliminary results suggest that sacrifice of the brachialis, which is a redundant elbow flexor, does not significantly downgrade function in this uniquely vulnerable patient population.…”
Background Peripheral nerve transfers are being used to improve upper extremity function in cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and perioperative complications following these procedures. Methods Eligible SCI patients with upper extremity dysfunction were assessed and followed for a minimum of 3 months after surgery. Data regarding demographics, medical history, physical examination, electrodiagnostic testing, intraoperative nerve stimulation, recipient nerve histomorphometry, surgical procedure, and complications were collected. Results Seven patients had surgery on eight limbs, mean age of 28±9.9 years and mean time from SCI injury of 5.1± 5.2 years. All patients had volitional elbow flexion and no volitional hand function. The nerve to the brachialis muscle was used as the expendable donor, and the recipients included the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) (for volitional prehension), nerve branches to the flexor carpi radialis, and flexor digitorum superficialis. Two patients underwent additional nerve transfers: (1) supinator to extensor carpi ulnaris or (2) deltoid to triceps. No patients had any loss of baseline upper extremity function, seven of eight AIN nerve specimens had preserved micro-architecture, and all intraoperative stimulation of recipient neuromuscular units was successful further supporting feasibility. Four patients had perioperative complications; all resolved or improved (paresthesias). Conclusion Nerve transfers can be used to reestablish volitional control of hand function in SCI. This surgery does not downgrade existing function, uses expendable donor nerve, and has no postoperative immobilization, which might make it a more viable option than traditional tendon transfer and other procedures.
“…If electrically stimulated, they show contractions. Surgery in this case appears relatively timeindependent: a nerve transfer can switch motor control from a redundant and expendable donor to a muscle group distal to the lesion site bypassing the level of injury [32,33]. In this way, the functional motor units are reconnected to the central nervous system, potentially restoring volitional control.…”
The aim of our work is to propose a systematic approach in the management of the upper limb rehabilitation in tetraplegic patients, focused on the preoperative rehabilitation aspects that must be tailored to the specific therapeutic path, in order to assure the best conditions both before the intervention or the conservative management, and optimize the results.Methods: Evaluation criteria, surgical and rehabilitation timing with reference to the recent literature are reported. Timing and objectives of upper limb rehabilitation in tetraplegic patients are discussed, focusing on obstacles in the management of patients that can be overcome with a multidisciplinary approach.Results and Discussion: The upper limb diagnostic-therapeutic path of tetraplegic patients is developed point by point, starting from the evaluation, the indications, therapeutic options, surgical timing and focusing on the role of pre-operative rehabilitation. At present, there is consensus regarding the need for physiotherapy aimed to maintain flexible joints if surgery is planned or learning compensatory mechanisms for candidates to a conservative management. The application timing of rehabilitation protocols in relation to the different surgical strategies is of great importance, as the choice to perform the classic tendon transfers or the most innovative nerve transfers influences the entire therapeutic path.
Conclusion:The management of the tetraplegic patient requires a coordinated and multidisciplinary approach, which can be intended to implement residual functions, or prepare for surgery. Preoperative physiotherapy must take into account both the best personalized protocol and the timing dictated by the type of surgical choice.
“…Spinal cord bypass surgery using peripheral nerves[ 4 ], olfactory ensheathing cells[ 5 , 6 ] Schwann cells for transplantation[ 7 ] and neural stem cells (NSC)[ 8 ] have been performed. Studies in animals have shown improvements in injured spinal cord function when cells derived from the embryonic central nervous system of mice were transplanted[ 9 ].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.