Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate spinal accessory nerve function after functional neck dissection (FND) and radical neck dissection (RND) by monitoring the nerve with electromyographic (EMG) examinations. A prospective, double-blind, clinical study was undertaken in 21 patients (42 neck side dissections) operated on for head and neck malignant diseases, separated into two groups: 10 neck sides in the RND group and 32 neck sides in the FND group. Electromyographic examinations were performed pre-operativel… Show more
“…These findings are in agreement with those from our study 15 . We have noticed that Snd causes better shoulder function when compared to other types of dissections; this difference has been explained by less level V manipulation during the surgical procedure, resulting in less damage to the accessory nerve and the neck plexus 1,7,[12][13][14]17,18 . The shoulder syndrome is an important sequela of nd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…electrophysiological evaluations have shown that, despite the nerve's anatomical integrity, the risk is even greater whenever the neck's posterior triangle is involved (level V) 1,[15][16][17] . The muscles' denervation potentials become characteristic after two to three weeks of the lesion, first on the proximal muscles, later on the distal ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, this procedure may cause severe morbidity. One of the most common complications stemming from nd is shoulder dysfunction caused by manipulation of the spinal accessory nerve (Xi cranial nerve) -which causes atrophy of the trapezium muscle.…”
Tt he most common complication of neck dissection is shoulder dysfunction due to manipulation of spinal accessory nerve, resulting in trapezius muscle atrophy mainly in procedures involving the posterior neck triangle.Aim: This study used electromyography to evaluate the injury to the spinal accessory nerve following neck dissection.Materials and methods: prospective case series of 51 patients submitted to 60 neck dissections followed by physical therapy evaluation of shoulder dysfunction. nerve integrity was evaluated before and after the surgery by means of surface eMG registering the electric activity of the trapezius muscle during voluntary contraction. The patients were grouped according to the type of neck dissection, presence of shoulder pain, impairment during abduction movement and hypotrophy/ atrophy of the trapezius muscle.Results: Action potential had median values of 54.3 microV before surgery and 11.6 microV after it (p<0.001). There was a mean decrease of 70% comparing to preoperative values. The median was 12.5 microV after dissection including level iib, and 8.9 microV after dissection including levels iib and V (p<0.002).
Conclusion:Surface eMG is a sensitive and painless method for spinal accessory nerve dysfunction evaluation. The results suggest the usefulness of the trapezius muscle electromyography to confirm diagnosis and early physical therapy intervention in neuropathies of the spinal accessory nerve. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(2):259-62.
ORIgInAL ARTIcLE
BJORL
“…These findings are in agreement with those from our study 15 . We have noticed that Snd causes better shoulder function when compared to other types of dissections; this difference has been explained by less level V manipulation during the surgical procedure, resulting in less damage to the accessory nerve and the neck plexus 1,7,[12][13][14]17,18 . The shoulder syndrome is an important sequela of nd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…electrophysiological evaluations have shown that, despite the nerve's anatomical integrity, the risk is even greater whenever the neck's posterior triangle is involved (level V) 1,[15][16][17] . The muscles' denervation potentials become characteristic after two to three weeks of the lesion, first on the proximal muscles, later on the distal ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, this procedure may cause severe morbidity. One of the most common complications stemming from nd is shoulder dysfunction caused by manipulation of the spinal accessory nerve (Xi cranial nerve) -which causes atrophy of the trapezium muscle.…”
Tt he most common complication of neck dissection is shoulder dysfunction due to manipulation of spinal accessory nerve, resulting in trapezius muscle atrophy mainly in procedures involving the posterior neck triangle.Aim: This study used electromyography to evaluate the injury to the spinal accessory nerve following neck dissection.Materials and methods: prospective case series of 51 patients submitted to 60 neck dissections followed by physical therapy evaluation of shoulder dysfunction. nerve integrity was evaluated before and after the surgery by means of surface eMG registering the electric activity of the trapezius muscle during voluntary contraction. The patients were grouped according to the type of neck dissection, presence of shoulder pain, impairment during abduction movement and hypotrophy/ atrophy of the trapezius muscle.Results: Action potential had median values of 54.3 microV before surgery and 11.6 microV after it (p<0.001). There was a mean decrease of 70% comparing to preoperative values. The median was 12.5 microV after dissection including level iib, and 8.9 microV after dissection including levels iib and V (p<0.002).
Conclusion:Surface eMG is a sensitive and painless method for spinal accessory nerve dysfunction evaluation. The results suggest the usefulness of the trapezius muscle electromyography to confirm diagnosis and early physical therapy intervention in neuropathies of the spinal accessory nerve. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(2):259-62.
ORIgInAL ARTIcLE
BJORL
“…Functional outcomes following RND are inferior to spinal accessory nerve-sparing procedures due to the resultant chronic trapezius dysfunction. 7,9,13,33,43,50,53 The MRND and SND procedures were developed to spare the spinal accessory nerve, thus limit trapezius dysfunction; however, significant incidence of spinal accessory nerve injury has been reported 6,10,13,14,52,53 that might have resulted from nerve manipulation. 6,29,43,50,52 The MRND requires lymph node dissection at all levels, but the spinal accessory nerve is usually spared.…”
Section: Case Series Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Spinal accessory nerve injury commonly occurs during neck dissection surgery. 2,6,9,11,[13][14][15][27][28][29]31,43,46,48,49,52,53 Neck dissection surgery is performed to treat head and neck carcinoma and is categorized into 3 different procedures: radical S pinal accessory nerve palsy (SANP) is common following neck dissection surgery or lymph node excision, 2,6,9,11,[13][14][15][27][28][29]31,43,46,48,49,52,53 blunt or penetrating trauma to the lateral neck region, 2,11 and cervical stretch injuries. 32 Spinal accessory nerve injury results in trapezius paralysis or dysfunction and a diagnostic cluster of signs and symptoms, including shoulder girdle depression, trapezius atrophy, scapular dyskinesis, loss of shoulder STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series.…”
signs and symptoms were found related to SANP. A strong relationship appeared between the presence of the scapular flip sign and SANP. The suspected mechanism for the scapular flip sign is the unopposed pull of the humeral external rotators by the inactive middle and lower trapezius. Early identification of SANP can assist with the prognosis, explain persistent impairments and functional deficits, motivate appropriate diagnostic testing and interventions, and help maximize outcome. Further research to validate the scapular flip sign and establish a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of SANP should be performed.
Background
Selective neck dissection (SND) is a mainstay of head and neck cancer treatment. A common sequela is shoulder syndrome from spinal accessory nerve (SAN) trauma. Extensive dissection in neck levels 2 and 5 leads to SAN dysfunction. However, it is not known whether limited level 2 dissection reduces SAN injury. The purpose of this double‐blind randomized controlled trial was to determine whether omitting level 2b dissection would improve shoulder‐related quality of life and function.
Methods
Patients with head and neck cancers undergoing surgery were randomized 1:1 to SND without level 2b dissection (group 1) or with it (group 2) on their dominant‐hand side. Patients, caregivers, and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) score after 6 months. An a priori calculation of the minimally important clinical difference in the NDII score was determined to establish a sample size of 15 patients per group (power = 0.8). Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) and SAN nerve conduction. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00765791).
Results
Forty patients were enrolled, and 30 were included (15 per group). Six months after the surgery, group 2 demonstrated a significant median decrease in the NDII from the baseline (30 points) and in comparison with group 1, whose NDII dropped 17.5 points (P = .02). Shoulder ROM and SAN conduction demonstrated significant declines in group 2 (P ≤ .05). No adverse events occurred.
Conclusions
Level 2b should be omitted in SND when this is oncologically safe and feasible. This allows for an optimal balance between function and cancer cure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.