1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6423(96)00021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spill — A logic language for writing testable requirements specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the compilation task, the user may select an optimization technique, such as simplification or partial evaluation, to obtain a more efficient target code. SPILL-2 (SPecifications In a Logic Language) is the second version of an executable typed logic language that is an extension of the Prolog-like language Goedel (Kluzniak and Milkowska 1997). A specification in SPILL-2 consists of a set of type declarations, a set of function declarations, a set of predicate declarations and a number of logical expressions (queries) that are used to test the specification.…”
Section: Specification Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the compilation task, the user may select an optimization technique, such as simplification or partial evaluation, to obtain a more efficient target code. SPILL-2 (SPecifications In a Logic Language) is the second version of an executable typed logic language that is an extension of the Prolog-like language Goedel (Kluzniak and Milkowska 1997). A specification in SPILL-2 consists of a set of type declarations, a set of function declarations, a set of predicate declarations and a number of logical expressions (queries) that are used to test the specification.…”
Section: Specification Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it should be noted that bounded quantifiers and arrays were also studied in logic programming. In particular, they are used in the specification language Spill of Kluźniak & Mi lkowska (1997) that allows us to write executable, typed, specifications in the logic programming style. Other related references are Voronkov (1992), Barklund & Bevemyr (1993) and Apt (1996).…”
Section: Relation To Logic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, formal notations are not executable, although there are some directly executable formal notations such as Spill [3] and OBJ [4,5]. There are conflicting points of view about the advisability of a notation being executable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%