2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spiking of NIR regional models using samples from target sites: Effect of model size on prediction accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(54 reference statements)
7
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Better proportions were obtained by Shepherd and Walsh (2002), about 18%, Fystro (2002) about 20%, andWetterlind et al (2008) about 8%. Most of the high proportions are from studies covering large areas as does the present study, which suggests room for further improvement by spiking (Guerrero et al, 2010), i.e., inclusion of a few local samples.…”
Section: Prediction Of Soc From Nir Spectramentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Better proportions were obtained by Shepherd and Walsh (2002), about 18%, Fystro (2002) about 20%, andWetterlind et al (2008) about 8%. Most of the high proportions are from studies covering large areas as does the present study, which suggests room for further improvement by spiking (Guerrero et al, 2010), i.e., inclusion of a few local samples.…”
Section: Prediction Of Soc From Nir Spectramentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Most recently, many researchers have investigated the effect of SM on reflectance spectra, and some methods for removing or minimizing the SM and improving the prediction accuracy of SOM have been also put forward and explored, such as external parameter orthogonalization (EPO) [9,[13][14][15], direct standardization (DS) and piecewise direct standardization (PDS) [11,[16][17][18], "spiking" method [19,20], first derivative [21], slope bias correction (SB) [22], orthogonal signal correction (OSC) and generalized least squares weighting (GLSW) [23,24], spectral classification [25,26] and so on. The above-mentioned EPO, DS and PDS strategies usually require dry soil spectral libraries (SSLs) at a specific scales (global, continental, national or regional) and then use a projection matrix (or transfer matrix) to correct the moist spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take full advantage of the VNIR spectroscopy for soil characterization, it would be desirable to minimize the number of calibration samples [21]. Recent efforts have been made for better predictions of soil properties, with the assistance of soil spectral libraries at continental [7], national [21,22], regional [23] and local scales [22]. Nevertheless, it remains a challenge to develop an effective strategy for the VNIR estimation of SOM when the local soil spectral libraries are unavailable and in the areas where the soils are largely influenced by human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%