2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPH modeling of fluid–solid interaction for dynamic failure analysis of fluid-filled thin shells

Abstract: of fluid-solid interaction for dynamic failure analysis of fluid-filled thin shells. Journal of Fluids and Structures, Elsevier, 2013, 39, pp.126-153. hal-00819622

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, both Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 3.2 can be applied, and all kinematic quantities are, therefore, bounded. The central difference scheme is, thus, conditionally stable for the DAS (11).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, both Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 3.2 can be applied, and all kinematic quantities are, therefore, bounded. The central difference scheme is, thus, conditionally stable for the DAS (11).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, in the Arlequin problem (11), the constraint is imposed on acceleration such that CÜ n = 0 is verified at every time step. Thus, for the Arlequin problem (11) and the central difference time integrator, E coupling = 0 and the energy is conserved.…”
Section: Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SPH method which includes material strength was introduced by Libersky and Petschek . Caleyron et al studied the failure of a fluid‐filled tank under impact loading, including the resulting fluid leakage. They used Mindlin–Reissner finite elements (FE) to model the solid elements and SPH shells to model the fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPM is especially useful for complex fracture patterns such as crack branching and coalescence. Other promising techniques used for fracture modelling include smoothed particle hydrodynamics [36,37,38], molecular dynamics [39], the discrete element method [40], and the force potential-based particle method [41]. Although the aforementioned approaches may have certain advantages for particular conditions, in this study peridynamics was chosen for modelling granular fracture in polycrystalline materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%