2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-016-0777-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPH model for fluid–structure interaction and its application to debris flow impact estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPH method was proposed in 1997 for astrophysical applications (Gingold and Monaghan, 1977). Recently, this method has been widely applied to a large variety of engineering fields (Dai et al, 2017;Jamalabadi, 2020;Price and Laibe, 2020;Zhu and Zou, 2020). Compared to the mesh-based method, the major advantage of the SPH method is to bypass the need for numerical meshes and avoid the mesh distortion issue and a great deal of computational work to renew the mesh (Ma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Sph Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPH method was proposed in 1997 for astrophysical applications (Gingold and Monaghan, 1977). Recently, this method has been widely applied to a large variety of engineering fields (Dai et al, 2017;Jamalabadi, 2020;Price and Laibe, 2020;Zhu and Zou, 2020). Compared to the mesh-based method, the major advantage of the SPH method is to bypass the need for numerical meshes and avoid the mesh distortion issue and a great deal of computational work to renew the mesh (Ma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Sph Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems commonly consist of individual bodies with disproportional sizes and various shapes. The fines‐ballast granular structure typically exists at the railroad foundation, where the ratio between the volume of small (fines) and big particles (ballast) reaches a level of 1:10 . Components in the system could have distinctively different Young's modulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gridbased methods like FEM and FDM would encounter some numerical difficulties (e.g., severe mesh winding, twisting and distortion), when it comes to large-deformation problems. As a mesh-free particle method based on the Lagrangian description, the SPH method has an advantage in the simulation of large deformation [13] and has been widely used in the coupling modelling of solid phase and fluid phase [14][15][16][17][18]. In the aspect of solid-fluid coupling, a soil-water-coupled SPH modeling method had been developed to analyze the flowing behavior of liquefied soils, where liquefied sand was modeled as the water-saturated porous media [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aspect of solid-fluid coupling, a soil-water-coupled SPH modeling method had been developed to analyze the flowing behavior of liquefied soils, where liquefied sand was modeled as the water-saturated porous media [14]. At the same time, this model had been used to simulate the debris flow and regarded fluid-structure interaction as the repulsive solid-fluid force to assess the impact force of debris flows [15]. Meanwhile a two-phase-coupled SPH model in coordination with a constitutive model for unsaturated soils had been proposed to conduct the unsaturated seepage analysis of dike [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%