2020
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid material‐point spheropolygon‐element method for solid and granular material interaction

Abstract: Capturing the interaction between objects that have an extreme difference in Young's modulus or geometrical scale is a highly challenging topic for numerical simulation. One of the fundamental questions is how to build an accurate multi-scale method with optimal computational efficiency. In this work, we develop a material-point-spheropolygon discrete element method (MPM-SDEM). Our approach fully couples the material point method (MPM) and the spheropolygon discrete element method (SDEM) through the exchange o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ∆t crit is the critical time step size, α ∈ [0, 1] is a safety factor for stability, h is the grid spacing, and c is the acoustic velocity of the continuum. We note that unlike the stability condition in the original MP-DEM [27], Eq. ( 24) uses the mass of material point m p to account for potential gasification which makes m p very small.…”
Section: Barrier Methods For Contact Between Mpm and Demmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where ∆t crit is the critical time step size, α ∈ [0, 1] is a safety factor for stability, h is the grid spacing, and c is the acoustic velocity of the continuum. We note that unlike the stability condition in the original MP-DEM [27], Eq. ( 24) uses the mass of material point m p to account for potential gasification which makes m p very small.…”
Section: Barrier Methods For Contact Between Mpm and Demmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The existing MP-DEM framework [27] calculates the contact force magnitude using a linear spring model f = k N δ, where k N is the contact normal stiffness. However, the linear contact model does not guarantee satisfaction of the non-penetration condition, δ ≤ r p , because it cannot prevent the force magnitude from becoming greater than k N r p .…”
Section: Barrier Methods For Contact Between Mpm and Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations