2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPH-FDM propagation and pore water pressure modelling for debris flows in flume tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, SPH has also been utilized in geomechanics problems such as soil-structure interaction [2]; [51]; [1,4], slope stability [5], and foundation design [45]. For modeling granular flow, elasto-plastic constitutive models have been implemented into the SPH framework to capture the general behavior of granular collapse [2,8,11,38,40,48], granular flow on inclined flume tests [6,44], and landslides [7,21,39]; however, most of these studies have not considered the effect of basal friction. For instance, Huang et al [21] simulated the impact force of dry granular material on an inclined flume and achieved good results; however, the friction between the granular material and the flume base was not considered and, instead, a back-calculated viscous Bingham fluid coefficient was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, SPH has also been utilized in geomechanics problems such as soil-structure interaction [2]; [51]; [1,4], slope stability [5], and foundation design [45]. For modeling granular flow, elasto-plastic constitutive models have been implemented into the SPH framework to capture the general behavior of granular collapse [2,8,11,38,40,48], granular flow on inclined flume tests [6,44], and landslides [7,21,39]; however, most of these studies have not considered the effect of basal friction. For instance, Huang et al [21] simulated the impact force of dry granular material on an inclined flume and achieved good results; however, the friction between the granular material and the flume base was not considered and, instead, a back-calculated viscous Bingham fluid coefficient was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the pore-water pressure will dissipate from the shearing zone and the rest of the debris-flow mass. In return, the soil particles regain their contact friction and thereby increase shearing resistance of the moving debris [42,45,51]. A schematic representation of a debris-flow screen is illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Debris-flow Screenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential, working mechanism, and design principles of structural countermeasures such as barriers, baffle and deflection walls have been extensively studied and reported in the literature, i.e. open and closed check dams or generally rigid and flexible barriers [24,25,28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], baffle walls [26][27][28]39,40], deflection and channel-side walls [9,22,41], and debris-flow screens [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al presented a numerical method combined with a FEM and DEM for simulation of the landslide debris flow under seismic loading [23], while the mechanical parameters are hard to determine. Cascini et al used an enhanced numerical model which combines a 3D depth-integrated hydro-mechanical coupled SPH model for the propagation analysis of debris flows and a 1D vertical FDM model for the evaluation of the pore water pressure [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%