1996
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.3.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration.

Abstract: Four experiments investigated the effect of trains of clicks (usually 5 s long and at 5 or 25 Hz) on subjective duration in humans, as previous research had suggested that such a manipulation would speed up the pacemaker of an internal clock by increasing participants' arousal. The four experiments used temporal generalization, pair comparison of duration, verbal estimation, and production of short durations. In all cases, preceding the durations to be judged by clicks changed their subjective length in a mann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

34
248
5
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
34
248
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence any increase in arousal would have to be maintained for a similar interval. These same studies also suggest an increase in clock rate of only 10-30% (see Penton-Voak et al, 1996, for a discussion). Trains of clicks are likely to generate a different degree of arousal from saccades, but it is not clear why decay rate should vary so dramatically for the two kinds of resultant arousal functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence any increase in arousal would have to be maintained for a similar interval. These same studies also suggest an increase in clock rate of only 10-30% (see Penton-Voak et al, 1996, for a discussion). Trains of clicks are likely to generate a different degree of arousal from saccades, but it is not clear why decay rate should vary so dramatically for the two kinds of resultant arousal functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Arousal contributes to prospective duration estimation in general, and some specific biases (Penton-Voak et al, 1996;Wearden et al, 1998). It cannot, however, easily explain saccadic chronostasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of accumulated counts will be greater and the subjective duration longer, and this effect will be independent of the physical duration of the stimulus. By contrast, if the pacemaker runs faster in one condition than another then the difference between them will increase as the physical duration is extended because the number of accumulated counts is obtained by multiplying the rate of the pacemaker and the length of the accumulation period (Penton-Voak et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%