2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2016.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed-of-sound measurements in (argon + carbon dioxide) over the temperature range from (275 to 500) K at pressures up to 8 MPa

Abstract: The speed of sound of two (argon + carbon dioxide) mixtures was measured over the temperature range from (275 to 500) K with pressures up to 8 MPa utilizing a spherical acoustic resonator. The compositions of the gravimetrically prepared mixtures were (0.50104 and 0.74981) mole fraction carbon dioxide. The vibrational relaxation of pure carbon dioxide led to high sound absorption, which significantly impeded the sound-speed measurements on carbon dioxide and its mixtures; pre-condensation may have also affecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows a comparison of our mixture densities with other experimental ( p , ρ, T , x ) data for the (0.0505 argon +0.9495 carbon dioxide) mixture and the (0.2491 argon + 0.7509 carbon dioxide) mixture with comparable data found in the literature. ,,,, The literature data considered are in a temperature range within ±10 K of the present work, at pressures up to 8 MPa and have a composition range within ±0.05 CO 2 mole fraction of the current measurements. The experimental mixture densities reported by Yang et al (two-sinker magnetic suspension densimeter) for a (0.0505 argon + 0.9495 carbon dioxide) mixture at T = (273.15, 283.15, 293.15, 308.15 and 323.15) K and pressures up to 9.0 MPa agree with the EOS-CG within 0.18 %.…”
Section: Mixture Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure shows a comparison of our mixture densities with other experimental ( p , ρ, T , x ) data for the (0.0505 argon +0.9495 carbon dioxide) mixture and the (0.2491 argon + 0.7509 carbon dioxide) mixture with comparable data found in the literature. ,,,, The literature data considered are in a temperature range within ±10 K of the present work, at pressures up to 8 MPa and have a composition range within ±0.05 CO 2 mole fraction of the current measurements. The experimental mixture densities reported by Yang et al (two-sinker magnetic suspension densimeter) for a (0.0505 argon + 0.9495 carbon dioxide) mixture at T = (273.15, 283.15, 293.15, 308.15 and 323.15) K and pressures up to 9.0 MPa agree with the EOS-CG within 0.18 %.…”
Section: Mixture Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The experimental mixture densities reported by Yang et al (two-sinker magnetic suspension densimeter) for a (0.0505 argon + 0.9495 carbon dioxide) mixture at T = (273.15, 283.15, 293.15, 308.15 and 323.15) K and pressures up to 9.0 MPa agree with the EOS-CG within 0.18 %. The experimental data for a (0.2491 argon + 0.7509 carbon dioxide) mixture plotted in Figure (panel b), reported by Ben Souissi et al (two-sinker magnetic suspension densimeter) at T = (273.15, 283.15, and 293.15) K and pressures up to 9.0 MPa as well as by Wegge (single-sinker magnetic suspension densimeter) T = (273.15 and 283.15) K with pressures up to 20.0 MPa, are in excellent agreement with the EOS-CG 1 . In contrast, the data reported by Sarashina et al (glass capillary cell) for a (0.248 argon + 0.752 carbon dioxide) mixture show large deviations from the equation of state of up to 1.26 %.…”
Section: Mixture Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The speed of sound apparatus used at Ruhr University Bochum was based on the design of Meier and Kabelac, set up according to Gedanitz et al, and further improved by Wegge at al where the apparatus is also described in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure1. Isothermal density−pressure diagrams of CO 2 mixtures with (a) 50% Ar with experimental data (circles56 ), (b) 50% O 2 with experimental data (circles57 ), (c) 13.8% CO with experimental data (circles58 ), and (d) 28.895% N 2 with experimental data (squares59 and circles60 ). In all cases, soft-SAFT calculations are represented by full lines.T h i s c o n t e n t i s o n l y l i c e n s e d f o r c o n s u m p t i o n b y A u t h o r i z e d U s e r s a f f i l i a t e d w i t h s c i t e .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%