2014
DOI: 10.1021/je5007604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed of Sound, Density, and Related Thermodynamic Excess Properties of Binary Mixtures of Butan-2-one with C1–C4 n-Alkanols and Chloroform

Abstract: Densities and speeds of sound were measured for binary mixtures of butan-2-one with methanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol, and chloroform at temperatures of 293.15–323.15 K and at atmospheric pressure, with the uncertainties of 0.05 kg·m–3 and 0.5 m·s–1, respectively. The molar excesses of volume, isentropic compression, and thermal expansion were calculated for those systems from the measured speeds and densities and for the mixture of butan-2-one with ethanol from the data reported in the literature. The negativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous paper, 1 we explained the excess volumes of the systems (methanol, ethanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol) + butan-2-one by differences in size of the molecules of the alcohols and butan-2-one. That idea is indirectly supported by the lack of convincing correlations between the limiting excess partial volumes (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous paper, 1 we explained the excess volumes of the systems (methanol, ethanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol) + butan-2-one by differences in size of the molecules of the alcohols and butan-2-one. That idea is indirectly supported by the lack of convincing correlations between the limiting excess partial volumes (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No further purification was attempted owing to their high-purity grade, which was more than 0.99 mass fraction. 1415.5 12 1.4233 1.01501 9 1417.1 14 1.4243 1.01670 11 1415.98 16 1.0164 17 1.01539 18 1.0154 13 1.01591 19 1.0164 20 1.01487 21 1.0164 12 1.01591 15 1.0164 14 1.01445 16 31 1108 32 1.3264 0.7867 34 1102 28 1.3267 0.7866 23 1102.81 35 1.3275 0.786671 36 1.32645 28 0.78686 37 1.32645 38 0.7863 39 1.3266 0.78666 41 31 1152 32 1.3593 33 0.7858 23 1142 28 1.3593 25 0.785339 36 1.3608 32 0.78540 37 1.35922 28 0.7849 39 1.35922 38 0.78497 41 1.3593 49 0.7850 42 1.3597 1223.22 27 1.3850 25 0.8036 52 1223 28 1.38494 28 0.8033 25 1.385 53 0.8034 28 1.3852 41 1216 32 1.3838 33 0.7995 30 1206 28 1.3832 25 0.800 51 1205.64 35 1.3848 32 0.7996 52 1205.69 56 1.38307 28 0.79961 3...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lines are a guide to the eye. [101], () [102], () [103], () [104], () [105], () [46], () [47], () [48], () [106], () [107], () [59], () [63], () [108], () [109], () [64], () [69], () [110], () [111], () [112], () [73], () [75], () [113], () [77], () [78], () [114], () [80], () [82], () [85], () [115], () [86], () [116], () [117], () [118], () [119], () [120], () [121], () [90], () [91], () [122], () [123], () [124], () [125], () [126], () [127], () [128], () [129], () [100], () [130]. The lines are a guide...…”
Section: Methodsunclassified