Abstract:Objective: To conduct the first nationwide population survey to examine the associations between changes in speed of eating and weight gain over 3 years. The study also explored whether faster eating at baseline was related to healthyweight women becoming overweight after 3 years. Design: Longitudinal. At baseline, participants were randomly selected from a nationally representative sampling frame to participate in a prospective study. Women completed self-administered baseline questionnaires on demographic an… Show more
“…with responses including: "very slow", "relatively slow", "medium", "relatively fast", or "very fast". Results from this study demonstrated that, unlike the results from other cross-sectional studies, there were no associations with eating speed and BMI: neither faster eating at baseline nor change in speed of eating over the 3 year period increased the risk of becoming overweight (24). Because the relationship between eating rate and body weight remains undefined, additional studies are warranted.…”
Section: Eating Ratecontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…It has been postulated that increased ingestion rate is positively associated with body weight (22,23); however, one prospective trial showed that faster eating or a change in eating speed was not associated with increased risk for obesity at 3 years (24). Therefore, this association is still undefined.…”
Section: Slow Eating Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eating rate is one of many factors that has been suggested to impact body weight (22,24,96). published studies (20 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal, and one including both study designs)…”
“…with responses including: "very slow", "relatively slow", "medium", "relatively fast", or "very fast". Results from this study demonstrated that, unlike the results from other cross-sectional studies, there were no associations with eating speed and BMI: neither faster eating at baseline nor change in speed of eating over the 3 year period increased the risk of becoming overweight (24). Because the relationship between eating rate and body weight remains undefined, additional studies are warranted.…”
Section: Eating Ratecontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…It has been postulated that increased ingestion rate is positively associated with body weight (22,23); however, one prospective trial showed that faster eating or a change in eating speed was not associated with increased risk for obesity at 3 years (24). Therefore, this association is still undefined.…”
Section: Slow Eating Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eating rate is one of many factors that has been suggested to impact body weight (22,24,96). published studies (20 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal, and one including both study designs)…”
“…However, after adjusting for possible confounders, this association only remained in women [10]. Only two longitudinal studies in healthy populations—one from New Zealand [11] conducted in women, and the other from Japan [12] conducted in men—have analyzed the association between eating speed and weight change, and positive associations were reported in both. A recent longitudinal study conducted in a Japanese population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) showed that those individuals eating slower at baseline had a lower prevalence of obesity [13] and had lower BMIs and waist circumferences than those eating fast after 6 years of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a systematic review and meta-analysis of several cross-sectional [7,8,9,10] and longitudinal [11,12,13] studies, most of which were conducted in Asian populations, showed that eating quickly is associated with increased body mass index (BMI) and a greater risk of obesity [14]. However, the magnitudes of association across studies were significantly heterogeneous, something that was attributed to differences between the populations studied and to the methods used to measure eating speed (self-reported eating speed or self-reported eating rate) [14].…”
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality around the world. Lifestyle is recognized as a key factor in the development of metabolic disorders and CVD. Recently, eating speed has been of particular interest since some studies have associated it with the development of obesity and other cardiometabolic disorders. We aimed to assess the association between eating speed and various cardiovascular risk factors. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis within the framework of the PREDIMED (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea) study with 792 participants from the Reus-Tarragona center. Eating speed was self-reported according to participant perception and categorized as slow, medium, or fast. The association between eating speed and cardiovascular risk factors was assessed using Cox regression models with constant time of follow-up for all individuals. Compared to participants in the slow eating speed category, those in the faster eating speed category were 59% more likely to have the hypertriglyceridemia component of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) (Hazard Ratio, (HR) 1.59; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.16–2.17), even after adjustment for potential confounders (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08–2.02). No other significant differences were observed. Eating speed was positively associated with the prevalence of the hypertriglyceridemia component of the MetS in a senior population at high cardiovascular risk.
Mindfulness and slow eating techniques are commonly recommended to achieve weight loss within behavioural weight management programmes; yet the role of these eating strategies on acute energy intake (EI) and satiety are not clear. This study investigated the effects of mindful and slow eating strategies on acute EI and satiety. Twenty-four participants were randomized to one of three eating conditions (EAT, MIND, SLOW). For the EAT condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would for both test meal sessions. For the SLOW condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would for their first test meal session and to slow their eating for the second test meal session. For the MIND condition, participants were instructed to eat as they normally would during their first test meal session and were given brief instructions on mindful eating for their second test meal session. For each condition, participants were provided ad libitum access to a test meal, and EI was calculated based upon food consumed. Participants rated their level of satiety following each meal. There were no significant differences in EI between eating strategy conditions. There was a trend towards a decrease in energy intake in the MIND condition compared with the EAT condition and a prevention of increased intake in the SLOW condition. There were no significant differences in ratings of satiety between conditions. Although, neither mindful nor slow eating strategies significantly decreased acute EI or satiety; the results suggest that both strategies blunted the increase in EI observed in EAT that occurred across two eating episodes, which may suggest that these strategies can be important for modifying eating behaviour that may contribute to body weight regulation. Additional appropriately designed studies investigating these strategies appear warranted to confirm these findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.