“…An experienced trained 're-voicer' repeating what has been said can improve accuracy over Direct AST where the original speech is not of sufficient volume or quality (e.g., telephone, Internet, television, indistinct speaker) or when the system is not trained (e.g., multiple speakers, meetings, panels, audience questions). Re-voiced ASR is sometimes used for live television subtitling in the UK [12], and in classrooms and courtrooms in the US, using a mask to reduce background noise and disturbance to others. While one person acting as both the re-voicer and editor could attempt to create Real Time Edited Revoiced AST, this would be more problematic for creating Real Time Edited Direct AST (e.g., if a lecturer attempted to edit ASR errors while they were giving their lecture).…”