2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives in full-mission simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Qadir and Riloff"s [12] design of speech act features was based on the text corpus of message board posts, the features were comprehensive enough to cover speech act properties in other text areas. For instance, the applicability of this data analysis approach has been verified in previous research for extracting commissives and directives in verbal maritime communication [8]. Following the approach proposed by Qadir and Riloff [12], the list of commissive classifiers was developed and presented in Table II. 保证, 承诺, 答应, 诺言, 许诺 "pledge" 保证, 承诺, 发誓 "commit" 承诺, 致力于 "guarantee" 保障, 保证 "plan" 计划, 规划, 安排, 打算, 方案 "First person pronoun" 我, 我们 "future tense" 将, 会, 将会 "modals" 愿, 愿意, 一定 "future" 将来, 未来, 明天 "later" 以后, 之后, 后期, 晚些…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Qadir and Riloff"s [12] design of speech act features was based on the text corpus of message board posts, the features were comprehensive enough to cover speech act properties in other text areas. For instance, the applicability of this data analysis approach has been verified in previous research for extracting commissives and directives in verbal maritime communication [8]. Following the approach proposed by Qadir and Riloff [12], the list of commissive classifiers was developed and presented in Table II. 保证, 承诺, 答应, 诺言, 许诺 "pledge" 保证, 承诺, 发誓 "commit" 承诺, 致力于 "guarantee" 保障, 保证 "plan" 计划, 规划, 安排, 打算, 方案 "First person pronoun" 我, 我们 "future tense" 将, 会, 将会 "modals" 愿, 愿意, 一定 "future" 将来, 未来, 明天 "later" 以后, 之后, 后期, 晚些…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Speech acts has been a popular research topic in recent pragmatic studies. For example, John et al [8] analyzed speech acts by native and non-native speakers of English in professional maritime communication to examine possible risks of miscommunication. Besides, Licea-Haquet et al [9] conducted an academic study on how Spanish speakers recognize speech acts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) : Here, try this 5The purpose of ADJT's speech can be understood by the interlocutor, which comes from different social identities and social distances. John et al (2019) argued that a message could be considered successful if the speaker gives code, processed by the interlocutor, then translated properly by the interlocutor to run communication effectively. In delivering data (4) above to make the interlocutor understand the request indirectly, ADJT used yesno question pattern.…”
Section: Asking Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searle (1979); Lee (2019) stated that locution is a basic meaning, hidden purpose illocution of speakers, and perlocution results from the illocutionary speech. According to John et al (2019), illocution can pressure speech partners to properly solve the message code. Meanwhile, the type of speech act is divided into five.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation has been analyzed by John, Brooks, & Schriever (2019). It focused in the use of commissive and directive utterances which gave an impact and emerged a risk in the speaker and hearer action.…”
Section: Paper Speech Acts In Professional Maritim Discourse: a Pragmmentioning
confidence: 99%