2009
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2009.081586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio using goodness of fit testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
127
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6], Anderson-Darling (AD) based goodness of fit test is proposed for spectrum sensing. In this paper, to avoid the estimation of noise variance, we apply the algorithm to test the normalized eigenvalues.…”
Section: Anderson-darling Based Sensing With Normalized Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [6], Anderson-Darling (AD) based goodness of fit test is proposed for spectrum sensing. In this paper, to avoid the estimation of noise variance, we apply the algorithm to test the normalized eigenvalues.…”
Section: Anderson-darling Based Sensing With Normalized Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, spectrum sensing can be formulated as a goodness of fit testing problem. In this paper, the goodness of fit test based on Anderson-Darling is adopted [6]. The steps are given as follows:…”
Section: Anderson-darling Based Sensing With Normalized Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our proposed schemes do not require a-priori knowledge of the incumbent (or opportunistic) user signal and hence we classify them as non-parametric schemes. We compare the sensing performance of our methods with the well-known ED sensing and AD sensing proposed in [6]. For KS sensing we used the assumption that the noise probability distribution is known to the user, as in [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it needs a short sequence of noise samples which can be measured from a reporting channel (where it is sure that a transmitted signal is not present). It should be noted that this assumption is essentially the same as used in the well known ED (and other sensing algorithms like AD sensing [6]). Our scheme, t-sensing, compares the received signal samples with the noise samples and makes a decision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%