2017
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2017.2716921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum Allocation and Power Control for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in HetNets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
119
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its appealingly low complexity, matching theory has been widely used for solving diverse resource optimization problems in wireless NOMA networks [155]- [158]. The resource allocation in NOMA systems, such as user grouping and subchannel allocation, can be viewed as a classical matching problem, as exemplified by one-to-one [155], many-to-one [156] [157], and many-to-many [158] scenarios. The simplest matching scenarios is one-to-one matching, where each user from a set can be matched with at most one user from the opposite set.…”
Section: User Grouping and Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its appealingly low complexity, matching theory has been widely used for solving diverse resource optimization problems in wireless NOMA networks [155]- [158]. The resource allocation in NOMA systems, such as user grouping and subchannel allocation, can be viewed as a classical matching problem, as exemplified by one-to-one [155], many-to-one [156] [157], and many-to-many [158] scenarios. The simplest matching scenarios is one-to-one matching, where each user from a set can be matched with at most one user from the opposite set.…”
Section: User Grouping and Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair of users belonging to the matched user pair can share the same spectrum in oredr to improve each user's data rate and the entire system's sum rate. Regarding heterogeneous NOMA networks, a many-to-one matching solution was invoked for solving a challenging spectrum allocation problem in [156], where a swap-operation aided matching algorithm was proposed for matching a small base stations with a suitable resource block, whilst aiming for maximizing the small cell users throughput. In many-to-many matching, at least one player in one set can be matched to multiple players in the opposite set.…”
Section: User Grouping and Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar problems to [5] are studied in [7,8]. In [9], the authors study the problem of channel allocation and power control in non-orthogonal multiple access networks. They use a matching game to design a two-sided exchange-stable algorithm to solve the channel allocation problem.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They formulate a network utility maximization problem and they use stochastic geometry to obtain the analytical user association bias factors and the channel partition ratios. The works in [5,[7][8][9][10] solve the channel allocation or the user association problem without considering energy harvesting BSs nor the scheduling problem. In [11], the authors study multicast scheduling in cellular networks under deadline constraints.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Φ j i = {(i, Φ (j)) , (j, Φ (i))} ∪ {Φ\ {(i, Φ (i)) , (j, Φ (j))}} is defined as the swap matching function, in which only F-AP i and j switch. Compared with traditional swap operations in [9], which performs the swap if and only if the condition U s Φ j i ≥ U s (Φ) , ∀s ∈ {i, j, Φ i , Φ j } is satisfied, we propose a modified swap-enabled matching scheme. Since that M RUEs have been allocated to M RBs ahead of time, the interference to each RUE needs attention.…”
Section: A Rb Allocation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%