Applied Spectroscopy 1998
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012764070-9/50007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic Qualitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that portable instruments can also automatically determine the measurement time required to obtain the spectrum of a sample suitable for result generation, either qualitative or quantitative. Benchtop FT-IR instruments have traditionally used the Euclidean distance algorithm for spectral matching (or a close relative, like correlation), 555,556 which was originally developed for vapor phase gas chromatographic-infrared (GC/IR) spectra. 557,558 Typically, these IR spectra have flat baselines, as compared to condensed phase samples, and narrow features in the O-H stretching region where there is little hydrogen bonding in the vapor phase.…”
Section: Applications Development For Portable Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that portable instruments can also automatically determine the measurement time required to obtain the spectrum of a sample suitable for result generation, either qualitative or quantitative. Benchtop FT-IR instruments have traditionally used the Euclidean distance algorithm for spectral matching (or a close relative, like correlation), 555,556 which was originally developed for vapor phase gas chromatographic-infrared (GC/IR) spectra. 557,558 Typically, these IR spectra have flat baselines, as compared to condensed phase samples, and narrow features in the O-H stretching region where there is little hydrogen bonding in the vapor phase.…”
Section: Applications Development For Portable Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of the R 2 values is discussed further in the validation of the calibration models. The mahalanobis distance (M-distance) [54,55] measures the distance of outlier points from the mean of the group samples, according to a scale derived from the variability in the training set. This method was found to be unsuccessful in identifying outliers in cross-validation experiments as none of the samples were identified as outliers except for the model unaged and light aged samples.…”
Section: Calibration Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%