2009
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2008.2005117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Loss Characterization of Femtosecond Laser Written Waveguides in Glass With Application to Demultiplexing of 1300 and 1550 nm Wavelengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the morphology from overhead microscopy (not shown) for 1.25-NA writing appeared more nonuniform compared to 0.55-NA writing. The increased irregularity is known to cause higher Rayleigh scattering [4], which may explain the higher propagation loss of α = 0.6 dB/cm for 1.25-NA writing compared to α = 0.3 dB/cm for 0.55-NA writing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the morphology from overhead microscopy (not shown) for 1.25-NA writing appeared more nonuniform compared to 0.55-NA writing. The increased irregularity is known to cause higher Rayleigh scattering [4], which may explain the higher propagation loss of α = 0.6 dB/cm for 1.25-NA writing compared to α = 0.3 dB/cm for 0.55-NA writing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Δn value is 3-fold lower than what is attainable by photolithography [3] and results in mode sizes of ∼ 10-μm mode field diameter (MFD). Although such modes are wellmatched to single mode fiber (SMF), they are too weakly confined to be used in curved waveguides with less than R = 50 mm radius [4] that would otherwise cause high bend loss in ring resonators, Ysplitters, and directional couplers used in photonic integrated circuits. While relatively high Δn was demonstrated in high index (n N 2) exotic glasses such as nanocrystal-doped glass (Δn ∼ 0.018 [5]), comparably high index change in pure fused silica, the most important glass for optofluidic and passive telecom devices, has eluded researchers thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the optical loss coefficients for the microrod of 1b and 1d were estimated to be 70.8 dB mm −1 at 481 nm and 30.1 dB mm −1 at 522 nm, respectively. According to previous reports, such optical loss is due to self‐absorption and light scattering during light propagation along the microrods. Among the microrods 1d shows the lowest optical loss coefficient, which may be owing to the fact that the Stokes shift of 1d (see Figure A,B) is larger than those of 1a and 1b , and thus self‐absorption for microrod 1d is expected to be weak.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These compelling advantages of the femtosecond laser writing have motivated major scientific research projects by groups all over the world. Twenty years since the original paper by Davis et al, there are over 2500 citations to the original work, with demonstrations of devices including directional couplers [57], Y-splitters [58], polarization controllers [59], Bragg reflectors [60], interferometers [61], waveguide lasers [62], for novel applications in fields such as astrophotonics [63], quantum information [64], telecommunications [65], sensing [66], lab on a chip [67] and lab on a fiber [68].…”
Section: Femtosecond Laser Micromachining-a Unique Tool For Optical Pmentioning
confidence: 99%