1962
DOI: 10.1086/147436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Classification in Nine Open Clusters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the estimated distance modulus and the colour excess, we find the distance of NGC 225 as d = 585 ± 20 pc, which is in agreement with that found by Lattanzi et al (1991) within errors. A comparison of the reddening values with those estimated in previous studies shows that the colour excess obtained in this study is smaller than E(B − V ) = 0.29 mag given by Johnson et al (1961) and Svolopoulos (1962), while it is in agreement roughly with E(B − V ) = 0.25 ± 0.08 mag found by Lattanzi et al (1991) within errors. The distance modulus obtained in this study (m − M) = 9.30 ± 0.07 mag is in agreement with the previous estimates of (m − M) = 9.0 and (m − M) = 9.1 mag (Svolopoulos, 1962;Hoag & Applequist, 1965) within errors, as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the estimated distance modulus and the colour excess, we find the distance of NGC 225 as d = 585 ± 20 pc, which is in agreement with that found by Lattanzi et al (1991) within errors. A comparison of the reddening values with those estimated in previous studies shows that the colour excess obtained in this study is smaller than E(B − V ) = 0.29 mag given by Johnson et al (1961) and Svolopoulos (1962), while it is in agreement roughly with E(B − V ) = 0.25 ± 0.08 mag found by Lattanzi et al (1991) within errors. The distance modulus obtained in this study (m − M) = 9.30 ± 0.07 mag is in agreement with the previous estimates of (m − M) = 9.0 and (m − M) = 9.1 mag (Svolopoulos, 1962;Hoag & Applequist, 1965) within errors, as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Johnson et al (1961) measured the reddening for the cluster as E(B − V ) = 0.29 mag using the data presented by Hoag et al (1961). Svolopoulos (1962) determined the spectral classes for a number of stars in the field of the cluster, for which the photoelectric magnitudes were already given by Hoag et al (1961), and measured the reddening, the distance modulus and the distance of the cluster as E(B − V ) = 0.29 mag, (m − M) = 9.0 mag and d = 630 pc, respectively. Hoag & Applequist (1965) measured H γ equivalent widths of the brighter stars in the field of the cluster photoelectrically and determined their spectral classes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distance was later modified by Johnson et al (1961) who determined a reddening of E(B − V ) = 0.08 and a distance of 630 pc. UBV measurements of 28 stars were reported by Hoag et al (1961) and Svoupoulus (1962) found the same reddening and distance, but from spectroscopy he determined the following values for distance and reddening: 660 pc and E(B − V ) = 0.05. In 1965 Hoag et al (1965) gave new spectral classification for five stars.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…On the contrary, Bilir et al (2016) reported a larger estimation of age, 𝜏 = 900 ± 100 Myr, with the same distance 𝐷 = 585 ± 20 pc. Svolopoulos (1962) found a distance 𝐷 = 630 pc. Evaluation of color excess 𝐸 (𝐵 − 𝑉) varies from 0.151 ± 0.047 (Bilir et al 2016) to 0.25 ± 0.08 mag (Lattanzi et al 1991) and 0.29 mag (Svolopoulos 1962;Subramaniam et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%