Aesthetics and Neuroscience 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46233-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectating Myriam Gourfink’s Dances; Transdisciplinary Explorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post- (Gourfink) performance, subjects rated their adherence to a list of statements concerning their experience during the performance on a 1–5 scale (from “I totally disagree” to “I agree completely”). The questionnaire was constructed according to our research method, at the crossroads of phenomenology, cognitive science, and lived experiences [ 36 ]. In order to stay as close as possible to the spectators’ experiences during live renditions of Myriam Gourfink’s dance pieces, first-person data formed the raw material of our questions: both our own experience (in our immersion in the practice of Myriam Gourfink), but also input from spectators in earlier sessions, and from the dancers themselves [ 130 , 131 ], in order to better understand the resonance between their experience and those of the spectators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Post- (Gourfink) performance, subjects rated their adherence to a list of statements concerning their experience during the performance on a 1–5 scale (from “I totally disagree” to “I agree completely”). The questionnaire was constructed according to our research method, at the crossroads of phenomenology, cognitive science, and lived experiences [ 36 ]. In order to stay as close as possible to the spectators’ experiences during live renditions of Myriam Gourfink’s dance pieces, first-person data formed the raw material of our questions: both our own experience (in our immersion in the practice of Myriam Gourfink), but also input from spectators in earlier sessions, and from the dancers themselves [ 130 , 131 ], in order to better understand the resonance between their experience and those of the spectators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Warzer et al [ 53 ], using a pointing task before and after a training in Energy Yoga, has shown that the training affects not only the speed of controlled goal-directed segment of a voluntary action (the extension of the arm) but also, and especially, the non-intentional or non-controlled segment of that action (the retraction of the arm). The dancers train for at least 2 h before going on stage, and they continue to practice the different elements of the yoga described above during the dance and so remain in a “state” of meditation in movement during the entire choreography [ 36 ]. Gourfink’s dancers actively work to cultivate “the awareness of the delicacy of the transition between past action and present action” ([ 35 ], p. 28) and this tension brings about “a broadening of awareness” ([ 35 ], p. 28).…”
Section: Slowness Continuum and Duration: The Choreographies Of Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that our current protocols promote meta-attention to the interaction but we are still in the process of optimizing appropriate report collection (cf. [ 51 ] for relevant work with dance spectators, and [ 52 ] in the context of music improvisation).…”
Section: Investigating Togetherness: the Ici Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%