2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speckle suppression and companion detection using coherent differential imaging

Abstract: Residual speckles due to aberrations arising from optical errors after the split between the wavefront sensor and the science camera path are the most significant barriers to imaging extrasolar planets. While speckles can be suppressed using the science camera in conjunction with the deformable mirror, this requires knowledge of the phase of the electric field in the focal plane. We describe a method which combines a coronagraph with a simple phase-shifting interferometer to measure and correct speckles in the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(v) collapsing residual frames (obtained after PCA modeling and subtraction) using either a simple median or a variance-based weighted average (Bottom et al 2017), for both the PCA-ADI and PCA-SDI parts. For this purpose, we implemented the SDI equivalent of the algorithm presented for ADI residuals in Bottom et al (2017).…”
Section: Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(v) collapsing residual frames (obtained after PCA modeling and subtraction) using either a simple median or a variance-based weighted average (Bottom et al 2017), for both the PCA-ADI and PCA-SDI parts. For this purpose, we implemented the SDI equivalent of the algorithm presented for ADI residuals in Bottom et al (2017).…”
Section: Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing so means measuring the electric field associated with the stellar speckle in that plane. To do so, Bottom et al (2017) implemented a phase-shifting interferometer on the SDC to spatially modulate the speckle intensity. In this paper, we present the results obtained when implementing a selfcoherent camera (SCC).…”
Section: Principle Of the Self-coherent Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are however limited by speckles with lifetime shorter than few minutes (the speckle pattern then changes between the science target and the reference star). Other techniques can do focal plane wavefront sensing and correction (Martinache et al 2014;Bottom et al 2016a;Cady et al 2013;Matthews et al 2017;Bottom et al 2017). Most of them use a temporal modulation of the speckle intensity and they cannot calibrate the speckles with lifetime shorter than the time needed for calibration (usually 4 to 5 images, meaning few minutes for a typical star magnitude).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of achievable contrast and detection limits of low-mass companions, Figure 6a shows a typical 5-sigma contrast curve -but under sub-optimal seeing conditions of ~1''.5 -after RDI PCA reduction as described in section §2.3, for a bright (K A ~ 4.5) binary, with a K ~ 2 secondary component at ~ 0''.3 from the primary. No speckle nulling techniques 26 were used here, as it would further impact the observing efficiency ( Fig.3), but those might be valuable to investigate for follow-up observations of candidates in the near future. Also shown on Figure 6a with the second vertical axis are the corresponding mass sensitivity limits in M Jup , based on evolutionary models.…”
Section: Typical On-sky Instrumental Performancementioning
confidence: 99%