2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of non-common path aberrations at the Palomar telescope using a self-coherent camera

Abstract: Context. The two main advantages of exoplanet imaging are the discovery of objects in the outer part of stellar systems -constraining the models of planet formation -, and its ability to spectrally characterize the planets -giving information on their atmosphere. It is, however, challenging, because exoplanets are up to 10 10 times fainter than their star and separated by a fraction of arcsecond. Current instruments like SPHERE/VLT or GPI/Gemini detect young and massive planets, because they are limited by non… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fast and Furious (F&F; Keller et al 2012;Korkiakoski et al 2014) algorithm is an extension of the sequential phase diversity technique originally introduced by Gonsalves (2002). In conventional phase diversity techniques (Gonsalves 1982;Paxman et al 1992), the degeneracy in estimating even phase modes is solved by recording two images, one in focus and another strongly out of focus. This forces the user to either split the light into two imaging channels or alternately record in-and out-of-focus images.…”
Section: Fast and Furious Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Fast and Furious (F&F; Keller et al 2012;Korkiakoski et al 2014) algorithm is an extension of the sequential phase diversity technique originally introduced by Gonsalves (2002). In conventional phase diversity techniques (Gonsalves 1982;Paxman et al 1992), the degeneracy in estimating even phase modes is solved by recording two images, one in focus and another strongly out of focus. This forces the user to either split the light into two imaging channels or alternately record in-and out-of-focus images.…”
Section: Fast and Furious Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, is a regularization parameter for the pixels where a goes to zero that would otherwise amplify the noise. This solution only solves for |v|, which is a well-known sign ambiguity (Gonsalves 1982;Paxman et al 1992). The sign of v is solved by introducing an additional image that has a known phase diversity Φ d .…”
Section: Fast and Furious Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be further improved to 10-20 nm with a Zernike phasemask sensor (Vigan et al 2019), which corresponds to better than λ/100 per mode for K and L band. Furthermore, NCPA can be accounted for by focal-plane wavefront sensing techniques (Galicher et al 2019), which shows promising prospects of reducing wavefront error to lower than 10 nm given ample photons (Bos et al 2019). We therefore use λ/100 (or 0.063 rad) per mode as a reasonable baseline RMS wavefront error for subsequent calculations for exposure time.…”
Section: The Impact Of Non-common Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few sensors have already been implemented and validated on optical test beds fed by an artificial residual turbulence (Singh et al 2019;Potier et al 2019;Herscovici-Schiller et al 2019). Some of these sensors were tested in the past to calibrate the quasi-static aberrations on calibration sources: the self-coherent camera (SCC; Galicher et al 2019) and the electric field conjugation (EFC; Matthews et al 2017) were tested at the Palomar Observatory, the coronagraphic phase diversity (COFFEE; Paul et al 2014) and the Zernike sensor for extremely low-level differential aberration (ZELDA; N'Diaye et al 2016a) were studied on SPHERE, while the speckle nulling technique was implemented at Palomar and Keck (Bottom et al 2016). However, only the speckle nulling technique with SCEXAO/Subaru (Martinache et al 2014) and ZELDA with SPHERE (Vigan et al 2019) were tested directly using on-sky measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%