2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specimen Preparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The needle-shaped APT specimens were prepared by using a Thermo Fisher Nova 200 dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB)/scanning electron microscope (SEM). The sharp APT needles were prepared by following standard site-specific lift-out and annular milling methods. , The APT data acquisition was performed on a CAMECA LEAP 4000X HR instrument in laser mode (laser wavelength (λ) = 355 nm) with a laser energy of 100–125 pJ, a specimen temperature of 50 K, a pulse repetition rate of 200 kHz, and a 0.5% detection rate. The APT data analysis was conducted using CAMECA’s Integrated Visualization and Analysis Software (IVAS 3.8).…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The needle-shaped APT specimens were prepared by using a Thermo Fisher Nova 200 dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB)/scanning electron microscope (SEM). The sharp APT needles were prepared by following standard site-specific lift-out and annular milling methods. , The APT data acquisition was performed on a CAMECA LEAP 4000X HR instrument in laser mode (laser wavelength (λ) = 355 nm) with a laser energy of 100–125 pJ, a specimen temperature of 50 K, a pulse repetition rate of 200 kHz, and a 0.5% detection rate. The APT data analysis was conducted using CAMECA’s Integrated Visualization and Analysis Software (IVAS 3.8).…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to TEM and FIM techniques, TKD technique has a higher field of view [88], [89]. Besides, obtaining orientation information using TKD is much easier as compared to that using TEM and/or FIM techniques [90]. One of the limitations of APT is the influence of projection and lens effects on the allocation of atoms to a particular GB [91]- [93].…”
Section: Common Techniques For the Characterisation Of Gb Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%